2e022b47   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.global-warming   
   From: baron.von.mind@gmail.com   
      
   ms.banana was bravely running away from the words posted by:   
   >   
   > Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context posted previously:   
   >>   
   >> "small terrier"  whined like a right-tard:   
   >>>   
   >>> Man_of_Mind says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "small terrier"  sniveled the usual pabulum:   
   ----   
   >>>> --Tell us how you're going to stay on-task this time, carrier..   
   >>>   
   >>> I am on task..   
   >>   
   >> That's doubtful, as you're still babbling your personal attacks..   
   >>   
   >> Example follows..   
   >>   
   >>> The question is, do you know what it is ?   
   >>   
   >> Let's see..   
   >>   
   >> Someone hacked a set of e-mails, selected purposely to appear   
   >> as 'damaging' according to a failed political agenda, and all   
   >> you can think of to support your false conclusion regarding   
   >> the democratic process behind peer-reviewed and juried science   
   >> publications is that I haven't read the e-mails?   
   >>   
   >> I've got some really bad news for you on that..   
   >>   
   >> The kinds of sputtering and muttering you right-wingers try   
   >> to pass off as 'critical thinking' isn't tolerated in the   
   >> science profession.  It's a democratic process, the data   
   >> in this instance (HadCRUT1) was transferred from paper   
   >> cards/tape and magnetic media collected from decades of   
   >> research and station-related monitoring systems.  The results   
   >> have been shared all over the planet, the conclusions have   
   >> been argued about by much better educated and experienced   
   >> people than anything or anyone your fascist right-wing   
   >> noise machine could ever hope to become like, and you   
   >> still think that because you can dismiss the details that   
   >> you clearly don't understand in their full context, that   
   >> this somehow entitles you to believe that these excerpts   
   >> from the overall discussions somehow prove that "Science   
   >> Is A Left Wing Socialist Fraud"?   
   >>   
   >> I doubt that you'll be able to step outside of your narrow   
   >> minded belief system to this, but just try to imagine how   
   >> silly this looks like from the perspective of someone who   
   >> has studied science, physics in my own case, knows just how   
   >> competitive peer-reviewed science publishing is and how fake   
   >> science gets put to rights before you can says "Pons-Fleishman"..   
   >>   
   >> Thus, I'd say that your comprehension of global warming as   
   >> a scientific fact, and how that set of conclusions was reached,   
   >> is but the denials of a scientifically-illiterate person   
   >> who is clinging desperately to a failed 'status_quo' that   
   >> simply cannot continue to destroy the planetary ecosphere..   
   >>   
   >> --Another 'status_quo' that may not survive, as well..   
   >   
   > [yawn/flush]   
      
   I see that you again could not refute a single word..   
      
   --Your surrender is accepted, here's your own glass of STFU..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)