home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.european-union      The EU and political integration in Euro      25,589 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,136 of 25,589   
   !Jones to atropos@mac.com   
   Re: The Swiss Have Liberal Gun Laws, Too   
   02 Apr 18 06:15:12   
   
   XPost: alt.politics, can.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: jones@fobahor.com   
      
   x-no-idiots: yes   
      
   On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 22:19:53 -0700, in talk.politics.guns BTR1701   
    wrote:   
      
   >No, it wouldn't. The moron I was replying to-- and which context you cut   
   >out-- was saying that you'd have to pass a yearly psych test to *keep*   
   >your gun. Which is where I said, "Sorry, officer. My gun was stolen" in   
   >response to some bureaucrat suddenly declaring me mentally unfit so he   
   >could confiscate it.  No, it could also mean you recovered it.   
      
   Well, *any* law depends on general compliance; that's essentially the   
   difference between civilization and a short, brutal existence.  The   
   psych test won't work; however, a gun owner has to keep his or her   
   nose clean and this should be well-defined at the national level.  The   
   days of "my guns are none of your business" are quickly ending; gun   
   rights with no responsibility have pretty well failed on every   
   possible level.   
      
   Most of the time, if a person will choose a life of violent crime,   
   they have done so by age 21; they'll usually have a pretty long record   
   by age 25.  Idea being that people don't *usually* change radically...   
   not suddenly, anyway.   
      
   We'd do a lot better to tighten the reporting.  What, exactly,   
   constitutes a reported infraction?  That was the issue with the   
   Sulphur Springs shooter; article 132 of the UCMJ simply defines   
   assault and the conviction was a misdemeanor... under existing law it   
   did not have to be reported.  In my opinion, any infraction that   
   revokes (or might revoke) a drivers license (DWI, for example) should   
   also remove guns; if you can't be trusted with a car, I'd prefer that   
   you not have guns, either.   
      
   But, as far as a yearly qualification... that's a waste of time.   
   --   
   Quod si verum est, non dicere.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca