XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, uk.politics.misc, aus.politics   
   XPost: can.politics, talk.politics.misc   
   From: scooter@yahoo.com   
      
   U.S. not invited to Canada’s upcoming trade meeting only‘like minded’   
   nations allowed   
      
   By Mike Blanchfield	The Canadian Press   
      
   Canada has not included the United States in an upcoming meeting aimed at   
   saving the international trading system because it doesn’t share the views   
   of the 13 invited countries, says the new Canadian trade minister.   
      
   Canada will host senior ministers from 13 “like-minded” countries for a   
   two-day discussion in Ottawa later this month to brainstorm ways to reform   
   the World Trade Organization, said Jim Carr, Canada’s newly appointed   
   international trade diversification minister.   
      
   Carr said the group of countries he’s convened ultimately wants to persuade   
   Washington of the continued usefulness of the WTO, but for now the best way   
   forward is without the U.S. in the room.   
      
   “We think that the best way to sequence the discussion is to start with   
   like-minded people, and that’s whom we have invited and they’re coming,”   
   Carr told The Canadian Press.   
      
   “Those who believe that a rules-based system is in the interests of the   
   international community will meet to come up with a consensus that we will   
   then move out into nations who might have been more resistant.”   
      
      
      
   Asked what his message to Americans is in the meantime, Carr replied: “That   
   a rules-based system is good for them too.”   
      
   The WTO is one of a long list of international organizations and agreements   
   derided by U.S. President Donald Trump and his protectionist   
   administration. Trump’s top economic adviser, Larry Kudlow, has at times   
   branded the WTO as ineffective and simply “broken   
      
   In the case of the WTO, the U.S. has moved beyond hostile rhetoric and   
   blocked the appointments of new judges to its dispute settlement body,   
   which is threatening to paralyse the organization and prevent it from   
   making decisions.   
      
      
      
   “The impasse of the appointment of the appellate body members threatens to   
   bring the whole dispute settlement system to a halt,” says an eight-page   
   Canadian discussion paper that has been circulated among the 13 invited   
   countries.   
      
   The Canadian Press obtained a copy of the paper, which has not been   
   publicly released.   
      
   Carr said Canada is keeping an open mind on finding new ways to settle   
   international trade disputes.   
      
   READ MORE: Canada escalates softwood lumber fight with U.S., asks WTO to   
   step in   
      
   “But the main point is, we believe the WTO, reformed and refreshed, is the   
   best way to re-establish a rules-based system.”   
      
   Carr said efforts to persuade the Americans to see that point would have   
   been “a lot harder” if Canada hadn’t preserved dispute resolutions   
   mechanisms in the newly renegotiated continental free trade pact, renamed   
   the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.   
      
   “You want your major trading partners to admit that you need a dispute   
   settlement mechanism.”   
      
   Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told an Edmonton radio station last month   
   that independent dispute resolution mechanisms, which the U.S. wanted to   
   scrap, needed to be preserved because Trump “doesn’t always follow the   
   rules as they’re laid out.”   
      
   Canada is inviting Australia, Brazil, Chile, the European Union, Japan,   
   Kenya, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore and Switzerland   
   to two days of talks on the WTO starting Oct. 24 in Ottawa.   
      
      
      
      
   The Canadian discussion paper lays out three broad themes for the   
   discussion: safeguarding and strengthening the dispute settlement system;   
   improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the WTO monitoring function;   
   and modernizing trade rules for the 21st Century.   
      
   On the latter point, the paper acknowledges that “aging trade rules need to   
   be updated urgently to respond to the needs of the modern global economy,”   
   but notes “there is a divergence about the priorities.”   
      
   The paper doesn’t single out the U.S. by name, but it makes clear that   
   international trading institutions are “increasingly fragile.”   
      
   “The challenges facing the multilateral trading system cannot be attributed   
   to any single cause or any single country,” the document says.   
      
   “However, the combination of disruption and paralysis has begun to erode   
   respect for rules-based trade, and the institutions that govern it, paving   
   the way for trade-distorting policies.”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)