XPost: alt.politics, can.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "!Jones"  wrote in message   
   news:or24cddf9sggdn76s7p717qkh5c9uifpf4@4ax.com...   
   > x-no-idiots: yes   
   >   
   > On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 22:19:53 -0700, in talk.politics.guns BTR1701   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>No, it wouldn't. The moron I was replying to-- and which context you cut   
   >>out-- was saying that you'd have to pass a yearly psych test to *keep*   
   >>your gun. Which is where I said, "Sorry, officer. My gun was stolen" in   
   >>response to some bureaucrat suddenly declaring me mentally unfit so he   
   >>could confiscate it.  No, it could also mean you recovered it.   
   >   
   > Well, *any* law depends on general compliance; that's essentially the   
   > difference between civilization and a short, brutal existence.  The   
   > psych test won't work; however, a gun owner has to keep his or her   
   > nose clean and this should be well-defined at the national level.  The   
   > days of "my guns are none of your business" are quickly ending; gun   
   > rights with no responsibility have pretty well failed on every   
   > possible level.   
      
   Sweet, so list for us every possession and valuable you own, including where   
   it is stored, access codes, combinations, and instructions to access such   
   items.   
      
   After all, according to you there are no longer any rights to privacy,   
   unreasonable search, or even confiscation...   
      
   So show us how you comply with the world you envision.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)