6bd54f86   
   XPost: soc.culture.china, aus.politics, uk.politics.misc   
   From: jimNOwalsSPAMh3@gmNOail.com   
      
   On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:28:45 +0800, fyfpoon@gmail.com wrote   
   (in article   
   <29b11cd2-341e-421e-b069-cdca2dd1c434@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):   
      
   > On 4月21日, 下午2时28分, Jim Walsh wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:59:26 +0800, fyfp...@gmail.com wrote   
   >> (in article   
   >> ):   
   >>   
   >>> On Apr 20, 5:18 pm, Jim Walsh wrote:   
   >>>> You need proof that the Chinese workers are exploited?   
   >>   
   >>> There is a level of exploitation anywhere even in socialist Canada   
   >>> because the market is not perfect, but by and large the level of   
   >>> exploitation in China is very low given its employment market is quite   
   >>> competitive. You need to demonstrate the labor market is monopolized   
   >>> by a few biggies in order to establish exploitation. People are not   
   >>> necessarily exploited simply because they are poor.   
   >>   
   >> OK. Here is the proof.   
   >>   
   >> The CCP is in control of licenses, permits, etc. etc. (Of course, it will   
   >> grant them for bribes, but that is another story.) That is the monopoly you   
   >> say I need to prove to show exploitation.,   
   >>   
   >> In a humane society, the workers could form unions to protect their   
   >> interests   
   >> (not possible in the CCP-controlled economy).   
   >>   
   >> In a humane society, people could form cooperatives to produce goods in away   
   >> that protects their interest (not possible in the CCP-controlled economy).   
   >>   
   >> Would you like more proof?   
   >   
   > What you have shown is the CCP has replaced price mechanism with   
   > bureacratic power. This is different from that kind of employer-   
   > employee relationship we have been talking about. The result of this   
   > substitute has led to corruption, which raises the cost of   
   > production. But corruption in the production process does not   
   > _necessarily_ justify the formation of labor unions, which can easily   
   > lead to more corruption in a country where the infrastructure is not   
   > well developed.   
      
   I have shown the monopoly which you agreed led to exploitation of the Chinese   
   workers.   
      
      
   --   
   Love, Jim   
   (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive   
   crossposts.)   
      
      
   ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet   
   News==----   
   http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+   
   Newsgroups   
   ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|