home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.european-union      The EU and political integration in Euro      25,589 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,581 of 25,589   
   JC to All   
   9/11 Myth Huggers: 7 Years of Ignoring t   
   15 Sep 08 10:04:09   
   
   From: jesus475073@webtv.net   
      
   9/11 Myth Huggers: 7 Years of Ignoring the Evidence   
   The establishment media hold up an apple for your inspection, and they   
   tell you it is an orange. If I try to show you that you are looking at   
   an apple it does not make me a "conspiracy theorist," it makes me your   
   friend. Remember that! - Jesse Richard - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org   
      
   On the day of 9/11/2001 I was so caught up in the official explanation   
   of the events, which were already being drilled into our heads by the   
   establishment media, that I sent out an inflammatory e-mail in which I   
   slammed Islam for being a radical religion (as if there is such a thing   
   as a non-radical religion). It took me about two years before I started   
   admitting to myself that the official evidence really did not support   
   the official explanation of the events. As a matter of fact, the   
   official explanation was kind of laughable when compared to the   
   evidence. Only it really was not funny.   
      
    This article is not intended to provide you with the hundreds of   
   volumes of evidence that contradict the official explanation of the   
   events of 9/11. It is simply meant to point out a few interesting   
   dynamics that I have witnessed during my five years of research into the   
   event.   
   There are some clear tell-tale dynamics among the American people that I   
   believe go a long way towards explaining why the American people have   
   not taken to the streets to round up the members of the Bush   
   administration, most notably the Cheney/PNAC cabal, and burn them alive   
   for their roles in the events of 9/11. What I mean by this is that the   
   officially acknowledged body of evidence so convincingly incriminates   
   insiders that I can not imagine the American people not taking out their   
   anger on the real culprits.   
    Think about the rage you felt towards al Qaida and the Taliban when you   
   were told that they were the people responsible for 9/11. Well, just   
   imagine the rage you would feel when you realize that the evidence   
   actual points more directly to a sitting American vice president and his   
   comrades in the Department of Defense and in the Defense Policy Board. I   
   know how I feel and I assume, maybe naively, that I am not alone.   
   Back to point of this article. Let me point out a few interesting   
   dynamics  and personality types that I have observed when it comes   
   to the American people and their attitudes towards the official body of   
   evidence as it pertains to 9/11 culpability.   
      
    The One-Way Flipit - This is the term I use for the one-way phenomenon   
   of people altering their beliefs about 9/11 culpability. During the   
   seven years of post 9/11 life and during the five years of my research   
   into the events of 9/11, I have neither witnessed or heard of anyone who   
   realized that 9/11 was a false flag operation carried out by moles   
   within the Unites States military and intelligence apparatus, and then   
   switched positions and started believing the official story. I have not   
   even heard about one single human being in any country around the world   
   who, after examining enough evidence to conclude that 9/11 was an inside   
   job, reversed their position. I do, on a daily basis witness people who,   
   when told about some of the evidence not discussed by the establishment   
   media, change their position so that it aligns with the facts.   
      
    The American Dream Dopes and the Bleeding Heart Conservatives - These   
   are terms I use for people who ignore history and everything around them   
   and vehemently believe that America is the most wonderful nation in the   
   world that has never and will never do wrong. They also believe that   
   America is a real democracy and that the voting public has an actual say   
   in things. Too funny. Anyway, these people, when shown the mountains of   
   evidence eventually run out of counter arguments and accept the fact   
   that the evidence is overwhelming and damning of the Bush   
   administration, but fall back on the old "I still don't believe that   
   they would do such a thing!" These people, no matter how conservative   
   they may be, are the true bleeding heart liberals of the world.   
      
     Counter Truth Theorists - This is what I call the people who defend   
   the official story by offering explanations that the authors of the   
   official story don't even claim. They provide theoretical scenarios and   
   reasoning that have never been put forward by the officials. Just as an   
   example - any day of the week you can hear someone, on some talk radio   
   or TV program, talk about the 19 hijackers or Osama bin Laden when it   
   comes to 9/11. Well, according to the F.B.I the Osama is not wanted in   
   connection with 9/11 because they have no evidence linking him to the   
   events. And as far as the hijackers...7 of them are alive and the F.B.I.   
   admitted that they do not have conclusive proof of who, if anybody,   
   hijacked planes on 9/11. But the counter theorists keep spouting this   
   crap.   
      
     The Jewish Conditional Truthers -  These are people, mostly   
   Jewish people who have seen the 9/11 evidence, understand and accept   
   that it was indeed an inside job, but will stop all communication with   
   you if there is any mention of possible Israeli or Mossad connections   
   brought up. You can spot these people because they use the term   
   "anti-Semite" to identify anyone who exposed any wrongdoing by an   
   Israeli or by individuals who are working in the interest of Israel.   
      
    Daydreamers - These are the people who look at people like me and say   
   that they realize that the government lied to them about 9/11 but the   
   ramifications are too much for them to handle. So they just go about   
   their lives ignoring all around them. Sadly, many of these people are   
   parents and don't seem to give a damn what kind of world they are   
   passing down to their children   
      
     The Re-Open the Investigation Oxy-Morons - This is what I call the   
   9/11 truthers who keep saying that the original investigation was a   
   white wash. Folks...THERE WAS NO ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION! We don't need   
   to re-open one, we need to have one! The job of the Kean Commission was   
   to document the events as outlined in the prepared official story. Any   
   evidence or testimony that did not corroborate the official story was to   
   be left out. This was a rule of the Commission! Their mandate was to   
   make recommendations on how to improve national security, not to find   
   fault or blame and surely not to investigate!!!   
      
     US - We are the people who get it. When someone shows us an apple and   
   tries to tell us that  we are looking at an orange, we take that   
   apple and place it in the mouth of the liar, as he or she spins over a   
   nice open flame, like a nice roasted pig!   
   Well there it is. I think that everyone who still believes the official   
   myth of 9/11 can pretty much fall into one of the categories that I have   
   identified. I also think that America is "flipping" slowly into reality.   
   It is just too bad that most Americans still have no idea what the   
   evidence actually shows because our biggest enemy, the American   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca