XPost: aus.politics.guns, can.talk.guns, uk.politics.guns   
   From: nospam@anytime.com   
      
   "10x" <10x@teluös.net> wrote in message   
   news:dggps4lscp1f9qhb6jn7j7fe79bg170p45@4ax.com...   
   > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:39:42 +1100, "Blinky Bill"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Ah, it was me who was confused.   
   >>   
   >>Perpetually.   
   >>   
   >>> And that caused you to misunderstand.   
   >>> Every year the number of firearms per 100,000 in the U.S.of A.   
   >>> increases.   
   >>   
   >>Evidence?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Every year the number of murders (and gunshot wounds) per 100,000 in   
   >>> the U.S. of A. decreases.   
   >>   
   >>Evidence?   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> My apology.  I didn't realize you were refering to the total number of   
   >>> firearms murder in the U.S.A.   
   >>   
   >>It was you who referred to "fewer murders with guns every year" and  made   
   >>no   
   >>mention of rates. I addressed the claim you made, not the one you wished   
   >>you   
   >>had made.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Keep in mind that the U.S.A. has a very high non firearms murder rate   
   >>> compared to other countries.   
   >>   
   >>Does it? What evidence do you have for that.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>  Do you blame that on the presense of   
   >>> firearms as well?   
   >>   
   >>I don't even know if it is true yet.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Apparently there is a great deal of information you don't care to find   
   > out about.   
      
   And even more apparently you like to make up factoids for your gun-loon   
   propaganda and pretend you can bluff/bluster your way out of providing   
   evidence.   
      
   > Too bad you don't bother to do a little research.   
      
   And even more of a pity that you didn't - if you had, you would have some   
   credibility, but as it stands you have none.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)