a9ed523d   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.global-warming   
   From: baron.von.mind@gmail.com   
      
   ms.banana was bravely running away from the words posted by:   
   >   
   > Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context bravely avoided by:   
   >>   
   >> ms.banana was bravely running away from the words posted by:   
   >>>   
   >>> Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context posted previously:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "small terrier"  whined like a right-tard:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Man_of_Mind says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "small terrier"  sniveled the usual pabulum:   
   ------   
   >>>>>> --Tell us how you're going to stay on-task this time, carrier..   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I am on task..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's doubtful, as you're still babbling your personal attacks..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Example follows..   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> The question is, do you know what it is ?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Let's see..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Someone hacked a set of e-mails, selected purposely to appear   
   >>>> as 'damaging' according to a failed political agenda, and all   
   >>>> you can think of to support your false conclusion regarding   
   >>>> the democratic process behind peer-reviewed and juried science   
   >>>> publications is that I haven't read the e-mails?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I've got some really bad news for you on that..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The kinds of sputtering and muttering you right-wingers try   
   >>>> to pass off as 'critical thinking' isn't tolerated in the   
   >>>> science profession.  It's a democratic process, the data   
   >>>> in this instance (HadCRUT1) was transferred from paper   
   >>>> cards/tape and magnetic media collected from decades of   
   >>>> research and station-related monitoring systems.  The results   
   >>>> have been shared all over the planet, the conclusions have   
   >>>> been argued about by much better educated and experienced   
   >>>> people than anything or anyone your fascist right-wing   
   >>>> noise machine could ever hope to become like, and you   
   >>>> still think that because you can dismiss the details that   
   >>>> you clearly don't understand in their full context, that   
   >>>> this somehow entitles you to believe that these excerpts   
   >>>> from the overall discussions somehow prove that "Science   
   >>>> Is A Left Wing Socialist Fraud"?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I doubt that you'll be able to step outside of your narrow   
   >>>> minded belief system to this, but just try to imagine how   
   >>>> silly this looks like from the perspective of someone who   
   >>>> has studied science, physics in my own case, knows just how   
   >>>> competitive peer-reviewed science publishing is and how fake   
   >>>> science gets put to rights before you can says "Pons-Fleishman"..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Thus, I'd say that your comprehension of global warming as   
   >>>> a scientific fact, and how that set of conclusions was reached,   
   >>>> is but the denials of a scientifically-illiterate person   
   >>>> who is clinging desperately to a failed 'status_quo' that   
   >>>> simply cannot continue to destroy the planetary ecosphere..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> --Another 'status_quo' that may not survive, as well..   
   >>>   
   >>> [yawn/flush]   
   >>   
   >> I see that you again could not refute a single word..   
   >>   
   >> --Your surrender is accepted, here's your own glass of STFU..   
   >   
   > [yawn/flush]   
   >   
   > [yawn'flush]   
      
   Evasion noted..   
      
   --See subject header for cruel irony..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)