01439e89
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.global-warming
From: baron.von.mind@gmail.com
ms.banana was bravely deleting and bleating the usual because:
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slappings given to:
>>
>> ms.banana was bravely running away from the words posted by:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context bravely avoided by:
>>>>
>>>> ms.banana was bravely running away from the words posted by:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context posted previously:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "small terrier" whined like a right-tard:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "small terrier" sniveled the usual pabulum:
------
>>>>>>>> --Tell us how you're going to stay on-task this time, carrier..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am on task..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's doubtful, as you're still babbling your personal attacks..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Example follows..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The question is, do you know what it is ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's see..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Someone hacked a set of e-mails, selected purposely to appear
>>>>>> as 'damaging' according to a failed political agenda, and all
>>>>>> you can think of to support your false conclusion regarding
>>>>>> the democratic process behind peer-reviewed and juried science
>>>>>> publications is that I haven't read the e-mails?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've got some really bad news for you on that..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The kinds of sputtering and muttering you right-wingers try
>>>>>> to pass off as 'critical thinking' isn't tolerated in the
>>>>>> science profession. It's a democratic process, the data
>>>>>> in this instance (HadCRUT1) was transferred from paper
>>>>>> cards/tape and magnetic media collected from decades of
>>>>>> research and station-related monitoring systems. The results
>>>>>> have been shared all over the planet, the conclusions have
>>>>>> been argued about by much better educated and experienced
>>>>>> people than anything or anyone your fascist right-wing
>>>>>> noise machine could ever hope to become like, and you
>>>>>> still think that because you can dismiss the details that
>>>>>> you clearly don't understand in their full context, that
>>>>>> this somehow entitles you to believe that these excerpts
>>>>>> from the overall discussions somehow prove that "Science
>>>>>> Is A Left Wing Socialist Fraud"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I doubt that you'll be able to step outside of your narrow
>>>>>> minded belief system to this, but just try to imagine how
>>>>>> silly this looks like from the perspective of someone who
>>>>>> has studied science, physics in my own case, knows just how
>>>>>> competitive peer-reviewed science publishing is and how fake
>>>>>> science gets put to rights before you can says "Pons-Fleishman"..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thus, I'd say that your comprehension of global warming as
>>>>>> a scientific fact, and how that set of conclusions was reached,
>>>>>> is but the denials of a scientifically-illiterate person
>>>>>> who is clinging desperately to a failed 'status_quo' that
>>>>>> simply cannot continue to destroy the planetary ecosphere..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Another 'status_quo' that may not survive, as well..
>>>>>
>>>>> [yawn/flush]
>>>>
>>>> I see that you again could not refute a single word..
>>>>
>>>> --Your surrender is accepted, here's your own glass of STFU..
>>>
>>> [yawn/flush]
>>>
>>> [yawn'flush]
>>
>> Evasion noted..
>
> [drool,drivel, snivel of a retard flushed]
Anything else you wanted say about yourself?
--See subject header for cruel irony..
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
