XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.global-warming   
   From: baron.von.mind@gmail.com   
      
   "small terrier"  sniveled again:   
   >   
   > Man_of_Mind was amused by the knee-jerk pathology exhibited by:   
   >>   
   >> "small terrier"  changed the subject header:   
   >>>   
   >>> Man_of_Mind was scolding the contentious ignorance exhibited by:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "small terrier"  deleted and bleated when:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Man_of_Mind was scolding the contentious ignorance exhibited by:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I M @ stupid guy was muttering the usual right-tarded pabulum:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was scolding the contentious ignorance exhibited by:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "small terrier"  whined like a right-tard:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> "small terrier"  sniveled the usual pabulum:   
   ----------   
   >>>>>>>>>>> For someone with your alleged decades of experience   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Nothing 'alleged' about, little dweeblings..  I cut my teeth on   
   >>>>>>>>>> hexadecimal and 2's-compliment binary arithmetic in the mid-1960's..   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Sure you did..   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Sure did, and there's nothing you can say that will change that fact..   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Does that have anything to do with climate science?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yeah..  Did you have difficulties understanding what sorts   
   >>>>>> of histrionics Gay Goats and small terrier were resorting   
   >>>>>> to in order to avoid the discussion of how valid the science,   
   >>>>>> the computer models and the over all veracity of the idea   
   >>>>>> of global warming being real is?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Or, did you lose track of the matter at hand by trying to   
   >>>>>> dismiss my disagreement that these 'hacked e-mails' somehow   
   >>>>>> disprove the entire global warming hypothesis?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I find it amusing that someone championing science   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Evasion noted..   
   >>>   
   >>> Evasion ?   
   >>   
   >> Yup..  Will you address the subject, for once?   
   >   
   > I see, a nym shifting twit are you..   
      
   I haven't changed 'nyms much, forgot the other machine hadn't been   
   reset to something that you'd have trouble comprehending either..   
      
   > Evasion ?   
      
   You're the one that bespoke something about "championing science"   
   and I'm simply stating that I have studied science (eg physics)   
   long enough to find your nonsensical blather to be quite silly..   
      
   You make all sorts of presumptions up to support your silly   
   claims 'conclusions', but can't honestly address a single thing..   
      
   And when that fails you, you resort to the very actions that   
   you've dishonestly accused others of..   
      
   Example follows..   
      
   > Why should anyone take a person such as you who launches   
   > right into insults of any who dare ask to look   
      
   Your metaphor is but the weak-minded imaginings of someone who   
   cannot hope to begin to dispute the studies and published data   
   except by making up false claims and inferred insinuations which   
   are abjectly and utterly without merit..   
      
   --See subject header for details..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)