Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.european-union    |    The EU and political integration in Euro    |    25,589 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,129 of 25,589    |
|    JC to All    |
|    The case against Geithner    |
|    21 Oct 11 06:05:44    |
      From: jesus475073@webtv.net              --WebTV-Mail-16896-1470       Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=ISO-8859-1       Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable              The case against Geithner       Ratigan: Whose side is the Treasury Secretary on banks or       taxpayers?       By Dylan Ratigan       MSNBC              As we sit here today, Wall Street continues to exploit a policy of       government-sponsored giveaways and secrecy to pay themselves billions.       Record-setting bonuses due to banks like Goldman Sachs as early next       week.       Yet instead of acting as our cop, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has       become central to what may be a cover-up of the greatest theft in U.S.       history.       Here is the evidence.               COUNT 1: The AIG e-mails:       Recently-released e-mails show Geithner's New York Federal Reserve Bank       directing AIG to keep details of the 100-cents-on-the-dollar bailout       secret in 2008 a reversal of the traditional role of government, which       is to force companies to become more transparent, not less.               A Treasury spokeswoman says: "Secretary Geithner played no role in       these decisions and indeed, by November 24, he was recused from working       on issues involving specific companies, including AIG."              Friday, the White House also defended the Treasury Secretary: Gibbs:       These decisions did not rise to his level at the fed.              CNN's Ed Henry: How do you know that he wasn't involved? He was the       leader of the New York Fed.              Gibbs: Right, but he wasn't on the emails that have been talked about       and wasn't party to the decision that was being made. He wasn't party to       a decision to hide $62 billion dollar payouts to firms that became       insolvent during his 5-year watch at the New York Fed?               Congressman Darrell Issa speculates that perhaps Geithner wasn't on the       e-mails in question because his people felt so strongly they already       knew their boss's intentions that they didn't feel the need to bother       him with the details.               COUNT 2: He wasn't even a regulator! In Geithner's own words during       confirmation hearings in March: "First of all, I've never been a       regulator...I'm not a regulator."       According to the New York fed bank's Web site, that was your job!!       Quoting from the Fed's website: "As part of our core mission, we       supervise and regulate financial institutions in the Second District."       That district of course is the epicenter for bailed out banks and       billion dollar bonuses.               Count 3: "The Christmas Eve Taxpayer Massacre." As you were wrapping       those last presents, Geithner's Treasury Department lifted the $400       billion cap on taxpayer responsibility for potential losses for Fannie       Mae and Freddie Mac. The new cap? Unlimited taxpayer funds! Interesting       timing, Christmas Eve, Tim?       Still no word on recovering the hundreds of millions paid to the CEOs       who created this mess.               COUNT 4: He's too cozy with certain banks. Remember those call logs       when he first started 80 contacts with Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and       CitiGroup CEOs in just 7 months!       But Bank of America's CEO only got three calls. Apparently Bank of       America is not one of Geithner's favorites, especially when you consider       that there are still many unanswered questions about Tim Geithner's role       in threatening to fire Bank of America management if they didn't go       through with a deal to buy Merrill lynch.               COUNT 5: TARP Special Investigator Neil Barofsky's report says       Geithner's New York Fed overpaid the big banks through AIG by billions       of dollars. Geithner says it had to be done. Maybe so, maybe not, but       this takes us to our final point.       Since then, the Treasury Secretary has yet to really prove whose side       he's on â€" the Wall Street big wigs or the American taxpayer?               Here's the litmus test: Mr. Geithner, show us the past ten years       of AIG e-mails or step down so that we can get somebody who will. A       crime has been committed against the American taxpayer and right now you       are standing at the door of the crime scene refusing to let anyone in.               Show us you're not involved Mr. Geithner, prove the White House correct       in defending you. All we are asking for is the transparency promised by       the president you serve.              The Dylan Ratigan Show airs Monday through Friday from 4 p.m. ET to 5       p.m. ET on msnbc.       Â© 2011 msnbc.com                            --WebTV-Mail-16896-1470       Content-Description: signature       Content-Disposition: Inline       Content-Type: Text/HTML; Charset=US-ASCII       Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit              SUPPORT CHRISTIAN ISRAEL NOT FASCIST       ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!                     --WebTV-Mail-16896-1470--              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca