Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.european-union    |    The EU and political integration in Euro    |    25,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,415 of 25,590    |
|    Brewster to All    |
|    Lazy Trump Lovers Prefer Welfare Over Ga    |
|    21 Jul 18 00:35:01    |
      XPost: talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns, soc.retirement       From: Brewster4@yahoo.com              Red America’s Employment Gap Gets Larger the Closer You Look       States and metro areas that voted for Donald Trump have far lower labor-force       participation than Democratic-leaning parts of the country              By Bob Davis       Mar 6, 2018 12:17 pm ET       93 COMMENTS       The economic gap between blue and red America may be wider than you think.              Late last year, the Institute of International Finance compared the labor-       force participation rates between states that voted for Donald Trump (red)       and those that voted for Hillary Clinton (blue) and found blue-state       participation was about 1.5 percentage points higher. The reason: Blue states       were more likely to be heavy in job-creating industries like technology and       finance, while red states were more tethered to slower-growing sectors like       retail and manufacturing.              But the analysis needed to be refined, says the IIF’s chief economist Robin       Brooks. Big coastal cities have become job-producing engines and many of them       are in the blue states. A state-by-state analysis simply could reflect the       economic power of the coastal centers.              In a new analysis, the IIF, a banking trade association in Washington D.C.,       examined the impact of urban centers across the nation. Red states had 51 of       the nation’s largest 86 metropolitan areas. Of those red-state metro areas,       31 voted for Mrs. Clinton—making them “blue islands,” in a red sea, as Mr.       Brooks calls them.              The IIF re-ran their analysis by assigning those blue islands to a       reconstituted blue America. That produced even more dramatic results: The gap       in labor-force participation roughly doubled to about four percentage points.              Blue America's Labor-Force Lead       The political divide in who works is even wider when Democratic-leaning metro       areas are included withblue states in "Blue America."              To Mr. Brooks, the results help explain the firm support red America has for       Mr. Trump’s protectionist and anti-immigration policies. “To unite the       country, you need to supercharge the economy. Then the labor market will get       tighter and you’ll suck in workers on the fringe,” he says. “Much of red       America isn’t participating in the jobs growth. They’re on the fringe.”              Protectionist policies promise to stop jobs from moving overseas and       immigration restrictions block job competitors from moving nearby. In places       where job growth is slow—red America—that has an obvious appeal, he says.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca