Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.european-union    |    The EU and political integration in Euro    |    25,589 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,438 of 25,589    |
|    Dr Shantanu Panigrahi to All    |
|    Re: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi - UK's Unsung     |
|    05 Feb 19 00:05:10    |
      XPost: uk.local.kent, soc.culture.iraq, sci.agriculture.poultry       XPost: alt.agnosticism       From: shanpanigrahi@REMOVEyahoo.co.uk              CONTINUED (Part 3 of 3)              https://shantanup.wordpress.com              POLICE CLAIM THESE MESSAGES from phands@aol.com are NOT ACTIONABLE!       https://discussionforumfortruthseekers.wordpress.com/2012/12/10/ken       t-police-say-that-no-criminal-offence-was-committed-concerning-       poster-comments-from-phands-at-talk-rational -       03-10-2012: I look upon telling people about you as a public health       warning: Avoid the toxic waste from the sewer that is S.       Panigrahi... a verminous rapist who claims to be a doctor of       biology, but knows nothing about evolution, and works in a petrol       station. You are the least civilised person I know of. You advocate       rape and the viewing of women as chattels, and you pretend to have       a doctorate in biology, but you know nothing about biology.       06-10-2012: Calling a fucktard a fucktard isn't abusive, it's       descriptive.       07-10-2012: He's a suggestible fucktard... we sent him to A+ as       well/ 0 to banned in minutes.       08-10 2012: He actually did admit to "coercing" his wife into sex       after she said no, in a thread at SC. No joke. I was considering       forwarding it to the UK police.       14-10 2012: Have you tried not being a misogynist pedophile?       31-10-2012: Unless it's you enshrining oppression of women and sex       slavery for women in proposed laws. You hypocritical liar... You       are a revolting, hypocritical cunt.       2-11-2012: You can describe yourself as whatever you like... it       doesn't change the fact that you are an unenlightened, revolting       fucktard with the IQ of a small soap dish. Who asked women if it's       OK for them to be treated as sex slaves for desperately bigoted       middle-aged hindu chicken-molesters without the option of refusing?       Oh... wait... that was you. I think, given the evidence of what he       advocates on the internet, that he is a misogynistic cunt with the       IQ of smegma and the social skills of a wolverine with toothache,       while being a cowardly bully who only picks on women, and is       deserving an enema of barbed-wire soaked in phosphorus. Speaking       with all due mildness and restraint, of course.       3-11-2012: Hey, fuckface... you forgot the end of the quote: "You       fit right in". Sewers need more turds... and you fit the       description... and the smell. Oh... I'm also a Religion moderator,       just for completeness. But, yet again, try to figure out why       someone who is passionate about human rights is disgusted and       repelled by the foul nature of your views, particularly your hatred       and disdain for women... You are truly a clueless fuckwit...       Shantanu, wherever he is, is a self-avowed fucktard of the first       and worst water. No matter where he floats to the top of the bowl,       he'll always be a turd. I feel no burn... shanty is pathetic. As       you said, that was a throwaway comment ages ago, which (to be fair)       I have reiterated a few times to see what reaction I would get...       usually none, except for un-self-aware moonbats like the verminous       misogynistashantu... Once again wrong, fuckhead... look at the       membership dates. I was here long before we needed to wipe you off       our shoes. The "sewer" jibe is older than your time here too. Don't       you get tired of being wrong all the time? As for humanity, I don't       treat women as sex slaves... you have admitted on more than one       forum that you do, and that you want this barbarism enshrined in       law. In fact, the Human Rights forum at SC was set up at my       suggestion, and that's why I am one of the moderators thereof.       Further, you benighted clod, I actually care about rights and       equality - you only care about your own gratification, at any cost       to others. Before you accuse others of ignorance, I suggest you       check the plentiful evidence to the contrary... look at my Human       Rights (and other) posting history - you won't find me recommending       that other humans be subjected to my will. You, on the other       hand... As to your risible claim to be 100% right about       everything... now you claim to be a great evolutionary biologist...       a few days ago, you admitted that you didn't know enough       evolutionary biology to comment on a given topic, and requested       pointers to places to learn. Your own words also betray you again,       as you reveal in your turgid outpourings at wordpress, you were an       animal scientist, dabbling in chicken-feed, and failed to find       employment "in the field" (nice un-self-aware choice of words       there, O enlightened one), which is why you are now pumping petrol       and selling stamps. Hardly the stellar career of the self-       proclaimed most enlightened being on earth, is it, fail-boi?? What       happened? Did you get caught buggering the chickens? I note with       some schadenfreude, that the pathetic secular pacifists joke has       exactly one poster so far... you! Face it: you're a sad, miserable       misogynist failure with all the hallmarks of Dunning-Kruger       syndrome and the societal relevance of wampum... You are the one       without said iota... and not a shred of humanity either. What you       are finding at SC and TR, and all the long list of places you been       banned from or just plain ignored, is that YOU ARE WRONG. You are       not enlightened, you are execrable. I feel debased just knowing you       exist... Your own words expose you yet again as a foul misogynist       scumbag... Oooohhhhhh... is that wafer-thin veneer of passive-       aggressive civility slipping, fucktard? Certainly, no woman married       to you is free, even to say no. As for many of us (sadly not all,       which is why I am a Human Rights advocate)... we're free to make       our own decisions, and to chart our own course through life. You       want to deny that basic right to women. That makes you a verminous,       wrong, foul blemish on humanity. Are you tired of being wrong yet,       Dunning-Kruger dolt?... Errrrrrr... the subject was changed by you,       you mono-synaptic omni-tard. I just responded to once again point       out your egregious wrongness, you chicken fucking Dunning-Kruger       dolt... I hope that's irony, Sanshou... there's nothing nice about       a guy who wants to make sex slaves of women. And who admits to       forcing (coercing, IIRC, was the word) his wife to have sex, even       when she said no... Utterly perfect... except I suspect shanty is       under-endowed, given his approach to women... Don't forget...       bigoted failure moronic Dunning-Kruger chicken-buggerer       4-11-2012: I can read into your posts just fine, scumbag fuckwad,       and they just reveal your vileness. I note that you didn't deny the       coercion part... Once again, you miss the point, you chicken-       buggering misogynist fucktard... no one said you cannot give equal       rights - only that that possible and proper outcome has not yet       been reached... due mostly to the presence of horrible, nasty,       venal and stupid vermin like you... You started dropping one-liners       too, cunt. So, yet again, you get caught breaking your own rules...       Shanty is actually a loony, as decided by a doctor. A real doctor,       I mean, not some chicken-buggering Neanderthal like him... Here's              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca