XPost: alt.politics, can.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Shadow"  wrote in message   
   news:es28cddd5ietd1s83jufemk3jsl3aom8bf@4ax.com...   
   > On Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:06:17 -0500, !Jones  wrote:   
   >   
   >>x-no-idiots: yes   
   >>   
   >   
   >>   
   >>Well, 2a was about a "well regulated militia", not individual rights.   
   >>As far as the freedom to own guns, that can be, and always has been,   
   >>stripped for almost any violation even without a jury sentence.  If   
   >>you become a citizen of another country and remain a legal US   
   >>resident, gun freedoms are stripped.  If you desert from the army, gun   
   >>rights are stripped.   
   >>   
   >>The reason speeding is related to gun use is because it speaks to   
   >>responsibility.  If your drivers license is suspended, see how long   
   >>you keep your pilot's papers! ... same thing.  If you're irresponsible   
   >>in one area, you probably are in all areas.  If you're a doper, you   
   >>shouldn't have a gun.   
   >>   
   >   
   > At last, someone that understands .....   
   > I suspect the ones that disagree are shtting themselves at the   
   > thought of having to do a psych evaluation. Because they KNOW they   
   > won't pass.   
      
   And if the government should decide to administer a loyalty test in order to   
   vote?   
      
   Further, the government CAN impose a psych evaluation if they can show in   
   court reasonable cause to do so.   
      
   The problem is, you want people subjected to such without cause, and without   
   need simply to deny them their rights.   
      
   What other rights can the government then deny by requiring you to pass the   
   tests they establish for you?   
      
   Freedom of Speech? Press?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)