Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.guns    |    The politics of firearm ownership and (m    |    196,508 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 194,820 of 196,508    |
|    Waldo Johnson to All    |
|    The Second Amendment Was About Controlli    |
|    25 Jan 26 01:05:57    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: nowomr@protonmail.com              Historian Uncovers The Racist Roots Of The 2nd Amendment              Do Black people have full Second Amendment rights?              That's the question historian Carol Anderson set out to answer after       Minnesota police killed Philando Castile, a Black man with a license to       carry a gun, during a 2016 traffic stop.              "Here was a Black man who was pulled over by the police, and the police       officer asked to see his identification. Philando Castile, using the NRA       guidelines, alerts to the officer that he has a licensed weapon with him,"       she says. "[And] the police officer began shooting."              In the 1990s, after the assault on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco,       Texas, the National Rifle Association condemned federal authorities as       "jackbooted government thugs." But Anderson says the organization "went       virtually silent" when it came to Castile's case, issuing a tepid statement       that did not mention Castile by name.              In her new book, The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America,       Anderson traces racial distinctions in Americans' treatment of gun       ownership back to the founding of the country and the Second Amendment,       which states:               "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free       State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be       infringed."              Sponsor Message              The language of the amendment, Anderson says, was crafted to ensure that       slave owners could quickly crush any rebellion or resistance from those       whom they'd enslaved. And she says the right to bear arms, presumably       guaranteed to all citizens, has been repeatedly denied to Black people.       Repeal The Second Amendment? That's Not So Simple. Here's What It Would       Take       Video: Ron's Office Hours       Repeal The Second Amendment? That's Not So Simple. Here's What It Would       Take              "One of the things that I argue throughout this book is that it is just       being Black that is the threat. And so when you mix that being Black as the       threat with bearing arms, it's an exponential fear," she says. "This isn't       an anti-gun or a pro-gun book. This is a book about African Americans'       rights."       Interview Highlights       The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America, by Carol Anderson       Bloomsbury Publishing              On the crafting of the Second Amendment at the Constitutional Convention              It was in response to the concerns coming out of the Virginia ratification       convention for the Constitution, led by Patrick Henry and George Mason,       that a militia that was controlled solely by the federal government would       not be there to protect the slave owners from an enslaved uprising. And ...       James Madison crafted that language in order to mollify the concerns coming       out of Virginia and the anti-Federalists, that they would still have full       control over their state militias — and those militias were used in order       to quell slave revolts. ... The Second Amendment really provided the cover,       the assurances that Patrick Henry and George Mason needed, that the       militias would not be controlled by the federal government, but that they       would be controlled by the states and at the beck and call of the states to       be able to put down these uprisings.       Sponsor Message              On Black people's access to arms after the American Revolution              You saw incredible restrictions being put in place about limiting access to       arms. And this is across the board for free Blacks and, particularly, for       the enslaved. And with each uprising, the laws became even more strict,       even more definitive, about who could and who could not bear arms. And so       free Blacks were particularly proscribed. And so we see this, for instance,       in Georgia, where Georgia had a law that restricted the carrying of guns.              On the Founding Fathers' fear of a slave revolt, which was stoked by the       Haitian Revolution              When Haiti began to overthrow the French colonial masters and were seizing       that country for themselves, when Blacks were seizing that country for       themselves, the violence of the Haitian Revolution, the existence of the       Haitian Revolution, just sent basically an earthquake of fear throughout       the United States. You had George Washington lamenting the violence. You       had Thomas Jefferson talking about [how] he was fearful that those ideas       over there, if they get here, it's going to be fire. You had James Madison       worried. ...                     Whites ... were fleeing Haiti and were bringing their enslaved populations       with them, their enslaved people with them. ... [There was a fear that] the       ideas that these Black Haitians would have, that somehow those ideas of       revolution, those ideas of racial justice, those ideas of freedom and       democracy would just metastasize throughout Virginia's Black enslaved       population and cause a revolt. You had that same fear coming out of       Baltimore that then began to open up the public armory to whites, saying,       "You are justified in being armed because they're bringing too many of       these Black Haitians, these enslaved Haitians, up here who have these ideas       that Black people can be free."              On how the Black Panthers responded to restrictions on Black people's       ability to bear arms in the 1960s                     What the Black Panthers were dealing with was massive police brutality.       Just beating on Black people, killing Black people at will with impunity.       And the Panthers decided that they would police the police. Huey P. Newton,       who was the co-founder of the Black Panthers along with Bobby Seale, ...       knew the law, and he knew what the law said about being able to open-carry       weapons and the types of weapons you were able to openly carry and how far       you had to stand away from the police arresting somebody or interrogating       somebody. ... And the police did not like having these aggressive Black men       and women doing that work of policing the police. And the response was a       thing called the Mulford Act, and the Mulford Act set out to ban open       carrying of weapons. And it was drafted by a conservative assemblyman in       California with the support and help of an NRA representative and eagerly       signed by Gov. Ronald Reagan as a way to make illegal what the Panthers       were legally doing.                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca