XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.computer.workshop   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10ledf3$v1mr$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-28 16:40, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10le8pv$t7us$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-28 15:43, Diaper Joey wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>    
   > >>>   
   > >>> " BBC obtains footage from January 13 of a man they say is Alex Pretti   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "Videos appears to show him spitting at federal law enforcement and   
   > >>> attacking their vehicle"   
   > >>   
   > >> Even if true...so the hell what?   
   > >>   
   > >> The agents on scene couldn't know about it.   
   > >>   
   > >> It's demonizing the victim and nothing more.   
   > >   
   > > It's telling the truth.   
   >   
   > 1. You don't know that it is. X is hardly a reliable source.   
      
   So? What makes you the one who decides that?   
   >   
   > 2. It isn't anything that the agents on the ground could have known about.   
      
   How do you know? We have a pretty good investigation bunch   
   of people here.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)