Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.guns    |    The politics of firearm ownership and (m    |    196,508 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 195,546 of 196,508    |
|    Patrick to All    |
|    Editorial: Rearranging the deck chairs o    |
|    03 Feb 26 23:29:09    |
      XPost: alt.fraud, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: alt.society.liberalism       From: patrick@optus.com.au              As part of his budget proposal, Gov. Gavin Newsom last week announced a       new educational plan that sounds reasonable, as it streamlines regulatory       authority and places more oversight in the governor’s office. Per Newsom’s       statement, “California’s K-12 education system as being governed by a       fragmented set of entities with overlapping roles that sometimes operate       in conflict with one another, to the detriment of educational services       offered to students.”              The buck should stop with the governor, but let’s be realistic. The       state’s enduring educational problems will not be fixed by rearranging the       bureaucratic deck chairs and centralizing authority or even by boosting       funding, but by decentralizing decision-making and placing more of it in       the hands of parents. Top-down models rarely work in any endeavor,       especially education given that students all have their own individual       needs.              The plan echoes recommendations the Legislature made 24 years ago, but       were never implemented. A report last month from PACE (Policy Analysis for       California Education) revisited similar ideas, and pointed to “overlapping       roles and unclear lines of accountability.”              Specifically, as CalMatters explains, the proposal gives the state Board       of Education appointed by the governor control of the California       Department of Education and provides the elected superintendent of public       instruction with the authority to “foster coordination and alignment of       state education policies.” It’s unclear exactly what that means, although       it’s clear that it leaves that post with fewer responsibilities. The       current superintendent, Tony Thurmond, said that he was blindsided by the       governor’s proposal.              Rather than getting deep into the political debates, Californians should       look at K-12 education in terms of academic success. The latest statewide       test scores, released in October, showed some noticeable improvement, with       1.8% improvements in math and English year over year. That’s good news,       but EdSource reported that most scores failed to match pre-pandemic       levels: “Despite the improvement at all grade levels, the number of       students who were advanced or proficient in English language arts last       year only increased to 48.8%, 37.3% in math, and 32.7% in science.”              Those numbers are abysmal, and are far worse for minority and low-income       students. Recent boosts failed to close these gaps. A report from UC San       Diego in November revealed shocking data about the lack of preparedness of       incoming freshmen: “Between 2020 and 2025, the number of students whose       math skills fall below high school level increased nearly thirtyfold;       moreover, 70% of those students fall below middle school levels, reaching       roughly one in twelve members of the entering cohort.” So let’s not get       too excited about slight improvements.       Meanwhile, as EdSource reported in July, charter schools have seen       increasing enrollment and comparatively strong test scores. The vast       majority of those schools had high enough scores to merit their charter       renewal, with 16% scoring at the highest levels. It’s no secret charter       schools were far more adept at handling the COVID-19 disruptions. Instead       of building on that success and applying those lessons to traditional       public schools, the governor and Legislature have since the pandemic       limited charter-school expansion and focused on imposing new oversight       measures on them.              So while we have no real problem with Newsom’s streamlining proposal, we’d       urge him to promote an agenda that empowers parents and promotes       competition — rather than one that advances the teachers’ unions’ failed       agenda.              https://www.dailynews.com/2026/01/13/editorial-rearranging-the-deck-       chairs-on-californias-sinking-k-12-ship/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca