XPost: alt.transgendered, talk.politics.medicine, or.politics   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   KKKernal Corn  wrote in   
   news:6un7okpbaurus7olju12kbv8f79uq37duf@4ax.com:   
      
   > On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:41:32 -0700, Tal Yessen  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 04 Feb 2026 20:18:31 +0000   
   >>KKKernal Corn  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> >"Women's work", "men's work", "man is the breadwinner", etc   
   >>> >   
   >>> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_work   
   >>>   
   >>> Traditonal roles based on sex. What's your point?  Men can do women's   
   >>> work, women can sometimes do men's work. Women can be breadwinners if   
   >>> they're unlucky enough to be married to someone like you. Doing so   
   >>> doesn't change either one's 'gender' or biological sex.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>Ding!   
   >>   
   >>And until the 1950-50s gender did = sex, period.   
   >   
   > In fact, 'gender' is nothing more than a grammatical term: male and   
   > female corresponding to the two biological sexes and neuter   
   > corresponding to inanimate objects.   
   >   
   You don't understand what "gramatical term" means.   
      
   =========   
   Definition: It is a noun classification system that often has little or   
   no connection to the natural sex of the object, though it may categorize   
   words into masculine, feminine, and neuter classes.   
      
   =========   
      
   Note that it is saying that gender has no connection to biological sex -   
   which is exactly what I've been saying.   
      
      
   --   
     @..@   
    (----)   
   ----------   
   United we ribbit, divided we croak   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)