XPost: alt.transgendered, talk.politics.medicine, or.politics   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   KKKernal Corn  wrote in   
   news:h649ok14es6vdli8jhkutrs7k4hck8c4eo@4ax.com:   
      
   > On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 05:31:43 -0000 (UTC), Webbster    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>KKKernal Corn  wrote in   
   >>news:6un7okpbaurus7olju12kbv8f79uq37duf@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:41:32 -0700, Tal Yessen  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Wed, 04 Feb 2026 20:18:31 +0000   
   >>>>KKKernal Corn  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> >"Women's work", "men's work", "man is the breadwinner", etc   
   >>>>> >   
   >>>>> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_work   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Traditonal roles based on sex. What's your point?  Men can do   
   women's   
   >>>>> work, women can sometimes do men's work. Women can be breadwinners   
   if   
   >>>>> they're unlucky enough to be married to someone like you. Doing so   
   >>>>> doesn't change either one's 'gender' or biological sex.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Ding!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>And until the 1950-50s gender did = sex, period.   
   >>>   
   >>> In fact, 'gender' is nothing more than a grammatical term: male and   
   >>> female corresponding to the two biological sexes and neuter   
   >>> corresponding to inanimate objects.   
   >>>   
   >>You don't understand what "gramatical term" means.   
   >   
   > I certainly do. YOU don't understand that it's physically impossible   
   > to change sex.   
   >   
   it's physically impossible to change DNA, but DNA is not gender.   
      
      
   --   
     @..@   
    (----)   
   ----------   
   United we ribbit, divided we croak   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)