home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.guns      The politics of firearm ownership and (m      196,508 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 195,624 of 196,508   
   Claude to -hh   
   Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again   
   06 Feb 26 00:10:01   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: CF4@squckbox.net   
      
   -hh wrote:   
      
   > On 2/5/26 06:50, NoBody wrote:   
   > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:36:30 -0500, -hh   
   > > wrote:   
      
   Trimmed 100's of lines.   
      
      
      
      
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > "Huntzinger".  Done!   
   > > > Nah.  I've shown that I'm published & cited in the field, whereas   
   > > > you've shown that you can produce nothing of the like.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > > Wow!  A new claim.  YOU'VE been published and cited??  I've not seen   
   > > you provide any evidence that you've ever published anything.   
   >   
   > Your "saw nothing" because you chose to not look, not because it   
   > doesn't exist.  One example is in the citation whose URL is still   
   > listed above.   
   >   
   > Once again demonstrating that your lies are quite trivial to debunk.   
   >   
   >   
   > -hh   
      
      
      
   "The Role of Defensive Postures in Computing   
    Probability of Hit for Projectile Blunt   
     Impact Intermediate Force Capabilities"   
      
      
   I skimmed it. A few assumptions I made.   
   You, hh, are Hugh Huntzinger mentioned in the references section.   
   You aren't listed as an author of this particular version of this paper.   
   Maybe you contributed as an author to a previous version? I don't know.   
      
   My opinion of the paper is it's a gigantic, boondoggle, waste of time   
   which does little but keep government or government contractor pencil   
   pushers employed.   
      
   When the enemy is firing a Kalashnikov with a full bananna clip at you,   
   there is almost a 100% chance you are dead before you even get a chance   
   to duck.   
   Who the FUCK CARES HOW AND WHY?   
   Only the U.S.military could come up with such a useless, taxpayer money   
   wasting study.   
   So how much did this work of "genious" cost?   
   Sorry Hughie, but you just confirmed what a waste of government money   
   you are.   
   I'm so thankful I don't reside in the U.S. because if this is typical   
   of how your government functions you had better not get in a war with   
   my country.   
   I took the liberty of trimming this 'my dick is bigger than your dick'   
   thread.   
   You really have a high opinion of yourself Hughie.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca