XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 2/5/26 19:10, Claude wrote:   
   > -hh wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/5/26 06:50, NoBody wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:36:30 -0500, -hh   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >   
   > Trimmed 100's of lines.   
      
   Thanks.   
      
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Huntzinger".  Done!   
   >>>> Nah.  I've shown that I'm published & cited in the field, whereas   
   >>>> you've shown that you can produce nothing of the like.   
   >>>   
   >>> Wow!  A new claim.  YOU'VE been published and cited??  I've not seen   
   >>> you provide any evidence that you've ever published anything.   
   >>   
   >> Your "saw nothing" because you chose to not look, not because it   
   >> doesn't exist.  One example is in the citation whose URL is still   
   >> listed above.   
   >>   
   >> Once again demonstrating that your lies are quite trivial to debunk.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > "The Role of Defensive Postures in Computing   
   >   Probability of Hit for Projectile Blunt   
   >    Impact Intermediate Force Capabilities"   
   >    
   >   
   > I skimmed it. A few assumptions I made.   
   > You, hh, are Hugh Huntzinger mentioned in the references section.   
      
   Correct.   
      
   > You aren't listed as an author of this particular version of this paper.   
      
   Correct.   
      
   > Maybe you contributed as an author to a previous version? I don't know.   
      
   You already have it correct.   
      
   > My opinion of the paper is it's a gigantic, boondoggle, waste of time   
   > which does little but keep government or government contractor pencil   
   > pushers employed.   
      
   You're entitled to your own opinion on the worth of a paper.  Naturally,   
   those who did fund it had a different opinion.   
      
   > When the enemy is firing a Kalashnikov with a full bananna clip at you,   
   > there is almost a 100% chance you are dead before you even get a chance   
   > to duck.   
      
   Perhaps...if the AK was capable of accurate fire.  Good luck.   
      
      
   > Who the FUCK CARES HOW AND WHY?   
   > Only the U.S.military could come up with such a useless, taxpayer money   
   > wasting study.   
      
   Because posture never makes a difference for P(h) or (P(I|h)?   
      
      
   > So how much did this work of "genious" cost?   
   > Sorry Hughie, but you just confirmed what a waste of government money> you   
   are.   
      
   Gosh, how the whiners have changed tunes: no longer denying knowledge in   
   a field, but merely that of it was opined to be wasteful spending.   
      
   > I'm so thankful I don't reside in the U.S. because if this is typical   
   > of how your government functions you had better not get in a war with   
   > my country.   
      
   Oh?  Just what country?  Dumbfuckistan?  LuzerTrollia?  LameSockia?   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)