Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.guns    |    The politics of firearm ownership and (m    |    196,508 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 196,125 of 196,508    |
|    Trump-Epstein is a Rapist & A Sodom to Promises Promises    |
|    Trump-Epstein is a Rapist & A Sodomite (    |
|    16 Feb 26 22:07:30    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: mail-adddng@hmn.com              Promises Promises wrote:              >-fake-rape-victim/>       >              Stop defending the convicted adjucated rapist and convicted felon Trump-       Epstein.              In many religious countries rapist Trump would have hanged by now. In       Saudi Arabia he would have been stoned to death.              At least impotent old Trump-Epstein can't rape anymore because he's so old       even the Chinese boner pills won't get him up.                     February 7, 2026       The President’s Lawyers Submitted False Information About a “Law & Order”       Plot to the Supreme Court       The episode is cited in Trump’s challenge to E. Jean Carroll’s sexual       assault and defamation claim.                            Trump is shown in a small circle surrounded by black screen.              Donald Trump speaks to press after attending a hearing in the E. Jean       Carroll case.Michael M. Santiago/Getty       Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs.       Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.              President Donald Trump’s legal team submitted false information to the       Supreme Court in his ongoing legal battle against author E. Jean       Carroll—whom he was found liable for sexually assaulting in a Bergdorf       Goodman dressing room in 1996—according to documents reviewed by Mother       Jones.              Justin D. Smith, Trump’s lawyer in the case, misrepresented the plot of an       episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit in a November 2025 petition to       the court. Trump, along with some of his supporters, has for years claimed       that Carroll’s account of him raping and sexually assaulting her was copied       from the 2012 SVU episode.               Friends of Carroll confirm she told them about Trump’s assault years       before the episode was filmed.              Trump is asking the Supreme Court to overturn a $5 million judgment from       2023, when a federal jury held that he sexually abused Carroll and then       defamed her. (A separate $83.3 million defamation judgement against him       from 2024 is not directly at issue, but could be in the future if the Court       sides with Trump.) The justices are scheduled to review Trump’s petition on       February 20.              In the Supreme Court petition, Smith describes the episode as featuring “a       business mogul” who “fantasizes about raping a victim in a Bergdorf Goodman       dressing room.” He writes that the “plotline is virtually identical to the       false allegations that Carroll launched against President Trump.”              In the episode from season 13, entitled “Theatre Tricks,” there is a small       plotline about a sexual encounter in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room. But       the man involved is a prominent New York City judge, not, as Smith claimed,       a “business mogul.” And what happened in the dressing room, which is       discussed but not shown in the episode, was pre-planned and by all accounts       consented to. A person with knowledge of how the SVU episode came together       told CNN in 2019 that there’s “no correlation—none whatsoever” between       “Theatre Tricks” and Carroll’s allegations against Trump. Carroll has       repeatedly denied she made up her allegation based on the episode. At least       two friends of Carroll have confirmed the author told them about the       assault shortly after it took place and years before the episode was filmed       or broadcast.              Smith did not respond to a request for comment from Mother Jones on the       false information included in the petition. Roberta Kaplan, Carroll’s       lawyer in the case, also did not respond to a request for comment.              The Rules of the Supreme Court say that petitioners must present       information with “accuracy, brevity, and clarity.” Failure to do so, per       Rule 14.4, “is sufficient reason for the Court to deny a petition.” It is       unclear if Trump’s lawyer knowingly included inaccurate information or       failed to confirm the details of the episode in question.       E. Jean Carroll (L) and her lawyer Roberta Kaplan (R) leave Manhattan       Federal Court following the conclusion of the civil defamation trial       against former President Donald Trump on January 26, 2024 in New York City.       Carroll leaves a New York City court following the 2024 conclusion of her       civil defamation trial against Trump.Michael M. Santiago/GETTY              The plot of “Theatre Tricks” involves a struggling young actress who seeks       out sex work on a sugar daddy website, where she meets a judge who she       helps fulfill a “stranger rape fantasy” that involves invading a Bergdorf       Goodman dressing room while a woman tries on lingerie. It is one of over       550 SVU episodes spread across more than two dozen seasons containing       hundreds of different examples of sexual violence—from harassment all the       way to murder. The dressing room meet-up with the judge is mentioned for       less than one minute in “Theatre Tricks,” which centers on a separate,       nonconsensual sexual assault experienced by another character.              Carroll’s first public account of what happened with Trump in that dressing       room around three decades ago came in a 2019 New York magazine article,       excerpting her upcoming book. She detailed running into Trump when he asked       her to advise him on a gift for, as she quoted him, “a girl.” They went       around the store before he led them to the lingerie section, she wrote.              What unfolded next, as Carroll has since described many times, was Trump       leading her into the dressing room, lunging at her, pushing her against the       wall, pulling down her tights, using his fingers on her sexually, and       penetrating her with his penis. Carroll wrote that she was eventually able       to push him off and run out.              Carroll later sued Trump in 2022 for sexual battery and for defaming her by       denying it through New York’s Adult Survivors Act. While Carroll has       maintained that Trump used his fingers and penis in the assault, the jury,       which ultimately awarded her $5 million, stopped short of finding Trump       liable for rape under penile penetration. They found that Trump had       “forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing       immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm,”       according to District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over the case.              The legal definition for rape differs by state and, at the time, New York’s       law required penile penetration. (In January 2024, New York broadened its       rape law to include other kinds of nonconsensual anal, oral, and vaginal       sexual contact.) Despite that, Judge Kaplan wrote in 2023 that the jury’s       decision “does not mean” that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump       ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’” “Indeed,”       he continued, “the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”              Trump has consistently denied the claims, saying over the years that       Carroll is a “nut job,” “mentally sick,” and “not my type.” He has posted       on social media more than 100 times about her accusations.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca