Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.guns    |    The politics of firearm ownership and (m    |    196,996 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 196,983 of 196,996    |
|    Larry Parker to All    |
|    Liberals Admit Another Catastrophic Drug    |
|    07 Mar 26 00:47:01    |
      XPost: can.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: larryparker@alt.net              British Columbia ended its drug decriminalization “experiment” last       month after the liberal leaders of the west coast Canadian province were       forced to admit that the program had caused widespread chaos and failed       to alleviate the intensifying addiction crisis devastating communities.              The program “hasn’t delivered the results that we hoped for,” said Josie       Osborne, British Columbia’s Health Minister, in what could perhaps be       the understatement of the century. “At the end of the three-year pilot,       it is difficult, if not even possible, to attribute certain changes [in       the number of people accessing care] directly to decriminalization,” she       added.              This failure mirrors Oregon’s recent retreat from drug decriminalization       and strikes another blow to the insistence of American liberals that       allowing open use of hard drugs is a viable policy choice. In 2024, the       Beaver State’s Democrat-dominated legislature was forced to confront the       same reality as British Columbia, rolling back much of its       decriminalization policy after a surge in overdose deaths and worsening       public disorder.              The cases of Oregon and British Columbia teach the same hard lesson:       conservative warnings were right. Decriminalizing hard drugs does not       reduce harm. It multiplies death, erodes public safety, and negatively       impacts everyone, not just users.              Over the objections of Conservative Party lawmakers in 2022, Canada’s       Liberal–New Democratic governing coalition granted British Columbia a       first-of-its-kind exemption from the nation’s Controlled Drugs and       Substances Act. Then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau celebrated the move       as a “pilot” meant to be scaled nationwide. The exemption effectively       decriminalized hard-drug possession for adults, allowing individuals to       carry up to 2.5 grams of cocaine, methamphetamine, ecstasy, heroin, or       fentanyl without arrest or prosecution.              The results were predictably disastrous.              Canadian policymakers wagered that “destigmatizing” addiction by framing       it as a health matter rather than a criminal justice issue would steer       more users into treatment. But the policy had the exact opposite effect.       By imposing no accountability and requiring no recovery, it established       a permission structure for open, destructive drug use in public spaces.              Parents soon reported playgrounds littered with discarded syringes.       People began smoking fentanyl and meth openly inside hospitals. Within a       year, the Vancouver Police Department testified to Parliament that       officers were confronting “several high-profile instances of problematic       drug use” in parks, beaches, and transit corridors. Small businesses       suffered most, as families simply stopped going out, ceding public life       to the chaos the state had chosen to tolerate.              A comparative study examining British Columbia alongside several other       Canadian provinces found that leniency toward hard drug possession       coincided with a rise in opioid-related hospitalizations. The findings       punctured liberal claims that decriminalization would improve public       health, raising unavoidable questions about whether Parliament’s       progressive majority had recklessly conducted a social experiment on an       unwitting public.              But perhaps the greatest scandal of all in British Columbia’s fiasco is       how long it took the government to reverse itself. Back in 2024,       Canada’s Conservative leader, Pierre Poilievre, correctly described drug       decriminalization as “a wacko policy from a wacko PM that’s destroying       lives.”              Trudeau and his Liberal Party responded not by reckoning with the       policy’s failure, but by accusing Poilievre of courting “white       nationalist groups” and then kicking him out of the House of Commons for       the day.              Ultimately, it wasn’t rising deaths and public disorder that finally       moved Canada’s Liberal leadership to reverse course – it was politics.              As polling ahead of the 2024 election showed growing momentum for       Conservative challengers, Trudeau and his allies recriminalized the use       of hard drugs in public – a change designed not to actually stop the       harm, but to hide it from the view of voters.              But as the consequences of the policy got worse and worse, some Liberals       finally began to grow a conscience. Speaking at a Vancouver event in       late 2025, British Columbia Premier David Eby conceded, “I was wrong on       drug decriminalization and the effect it would have. It was not the       right policy.”                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca