XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican
XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio
.christian.roman-catholic
XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: j_carlson@gmx.com
On 2/25/2021 4:41 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 2/25/21 1:03 AM, Justin Tyme wrote:
>> On 2/25/2021 12:51 AM, Ed Rhodes wrote:
>>> Bill Flett wrote in news:s174h0$1j4$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 2/24/2021 6:35 PM, Ed Rhodes wrote:
>>>>> Justin Tyme wrote in news:s15fjb$8cm$1@dont-
>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The best answer is because he's not really the president. Justin
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He gives the State of the Union address after he's been in office for a
>>>>> year.
>>>>>
>>>>> The best answer to this questin is... you're, you know, stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The kid, whose name is not Justin, is only a troll.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Generally, I call him JusChiCin, for the three main personalities he's
>>> shown. But I was feeling generous.
>>>
>>
>> What are you going to do when Trump re-assumes the office of the presidency?
>> rightfully, I might add.
>
> Donald trump will never again serve as President, nor should he. He did a
good
> job,
He did not do a good job, and that's why he's out. But if you say he did a
good
job, and if he's eligible for the office again, then "nor should he" is
incoherent. If you think he did a good job, and if he's eligible, then the
only
logical position for you to hold is that he *should* hold the office again.
The logical implication of "nor should he" is that he did *NOT* do a good job,
and that's the truth: he didn't do a good job, he did a shit job.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
