XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.politics   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.conspiracy, alt.save.the.earth   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.int   
   lligent-life.down-here, alt.censorship   
   XPost: alt.apocalypse, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   From: NOT-SURE@ideocracy.gov   
      
   On 2/26/21 10:31 AM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:   
   > BeamMeUpScotty wrote on 2021-02-26 9:28 AM:   
   >> Otherwise Tibet Monks could force you to make their Wedding cakes with   
   >> "Yak Butter".   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Tibetan monks are Buddhist monks. Much like Orthodox Christian monks and   
   > Catholic priests, Buddhist monks are required to be celibate (no pussy   
   > bonking). So there is no such thing as "Wedding cakes for Tibetan Monks".   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   Do they discriminate against gays?   
      
   Are there no gay monks or gay Buddhists...?   
      
   And I was actually inferring that "Buddhists" still marry....   
      
   Much as the Rabbi is the one that forces the Jews to eat according to   
   the Jewish RELIGION edicts the Buddhist monks insist that the Buddhists   
   eat the diet of the Buddhists which probbably doesn't include killing   
   animals but I'm NOT-SURE if that includes milk/butter from animals.   
      
      
   Hence the problem with the Government mandating that a Bakery make a   
   cake according to religious edicts.   
      
   And while gays claim to be a different type of person they want special   
   gay stuff for them as if it were a religion.  And it may well be a   
   religion but it certainly isn't a different type of person proven by DNA   
   and science to be something other than a typical heterosexual with an   
   abnormal mental disorder that has caused sexual/ social-disorientation.   
      
   And be they a Buddhist gay or an Atheist gay, they still aren't   
   scientifically proven gay. Which may mean it's a religion all it's own   
   or a mental illness.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   That's karma   
      
   Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the   
   Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that   
   even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to*   
   *reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they   
   control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will*   
   *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same   
   things protect you from crime and violence?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)