Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,904 of 44,666    |
|    Rudy Canoza to David Hartung    |
|    Re: Arizona Republicans leading the way     |
|    26 Feb 21 09:53:34    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio       .christian.roman-catholic       XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: j_carlson@gmx.com              [followups vandalism by shitbag *LYING* pastor-to-the-KKK repaired]              On 2/26/2021 9:52 AM, David Hartung wrote:       > On 2/26/21 10:12 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:       >> [followups vandalism by shitbag *LYING* pastor-to-the-KKK repaired]       >>       >> On 2/26/2021 8:02 AM, David Hartung wrote:       >>> On 2/26/21 9:43 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:       >>>> By Melanie MasonStaff Writer       >>>> Feb. 26, 2021 5 AM PT       >>>> PHOENIX —       >>>>       >>>> The national battle over voting restrictions was, for one sluggish       February       >>>> afternoon, waged in a cramped hearing room of Arizona’s House of       >>>> Representatives. Separated by plexiglass barriers, Republican lawmakers       >>>> steadily plowed ahead on bills that, put together, could make it harder       for       >>>> Arizonans to vote.       >>>>       >>>> Members of a House committee advanced a proposal to forbid the use of       >>>> private money to help conduct elections, such as by buying equipment or       >>>> funding voter education. They approved a bill making it a felony for an       >>>> official to change any election-related date set in statute. They OKd a       >>>> measure to preemptively forbid same-day voter registration, which the       state       >>>> does not currently offer.       >>>       >>> These measure make sense, how exactly do they interfere with the ability of       >>> legal voters to cast a vote?       >>>       >>>> Each bill was portrayed by its proponents as a commonsense housekeeping       >>>> measure to guard against wrongdoing, or even the perception of it. Voting       >>>> rights advocates see a broader — and more damaging — agenda.       >>>>       >>>> “If you look at one of them, it may not seem that big a deal, but       there’s 50       >>>> or more of them,” Alex Gulotta, Arizona state director of All Voting is       >>>> Local, said in an interview. “They all add up to changing our election       >>>> system in substantial ways to basically respond to the ‘Big Lie’”       — that       >>>> last year’s presidential election was stolen from former President       Trump.       >>>>       >>>> Similar scenes are playing out in statehouses across the country, with a       >>>> barrage of voting restriction measures snaking through the legislative       process.       >>>>       >>>> Leading the way is Arizona, which has seen dozens of bills introduced this       >>>> year, the most of any state, according to the Brennan Center for Justice,       a       >>>> think tank at New York University Law School.       >>>>       >>>> “There are legitimate concerns,” said GOP state Rep. John Kavanagh,       chair of       >>>> the Arizona House’s Government and Elections Committee, “and we’re       >>>> addressing them.”       >>>>       >>>> Republicans championing these bills say they are necessary to restore       faith       >>>> in a system now widely seen by their constituents as suspect. Democrats       >>>> counter that the GOP is capitalizing on distrust they had fostered       themselves.       >>>>       >>>> https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-02-26/arizona-v       ting-restriction-bills       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> Suppressing legitimate voters is what Republiscums do. They know it's       the       >>>> only way they can cheat their way to electoral wins.       >>>       >>> You have often made this accusation       >>       >> And I have always supported it, as I did with this most recent post.       >       > I see nothing in the article which supports your assertion              Yes, you do. You're lying and pretending you don't see it, but you see it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca