home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 43,004 of 44,666   
   M I Wakefield to super70s@super70s.invalid   
   Re: Why Congress should require its memb   
   05 Mar 21 22:35:18   
   
   8765f889   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: none@present.com   
      
   On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 20:56:31 -0600, super70s   
    wrote:   
      
   >In article ,   
   > M I Wakefield  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:36:32 -0800, Rudy Canoza    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >Political polarization is spurring partisans to extremes, but thereā€šs a   
   >> >simple   
   >> >change Congress could make to reverse this alarming trend: mandate that its   
   >> >members be elected by a majority of votes.   
   >>   
   >> Even simpler:  Bust gerrymandering.   
   >>   
   >> That way, moderates, that have to appeal to both sides, can get   
   >> elected.   
   >>   
   >> As it stands for a lot of politicians, the toughest race is winning   
   >> the primary.   
   >   
   >The so-called "jungle primaries" can also help weed out the kookers on   
   >both sides.   
   >   
   >There's no doubt Congress is full of ideologues who have no intention of   
   >compromising with the other side and only interested in that 6 figure   
   >paycheck for as many years as possible.   
      
   Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca