Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,014 of 44,666    |
|    Rudy Canoza to David Hartung    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_The_=e2=80=9cArmed_Insur    |
|    06 Mar 21 11:04:33    |
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: j_carlson@gmx.com   
      
   [followups vandalism by shitbag *LYING* pastor-to-the-KKK repaired]   
      
   On 3/6/2021 9:42 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   > On 3/6/21 11:02 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> On 3/6/2021 4:56 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>> On 3/6/21 1:02 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >>>> On 3/5/2021 11:21 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>>> On 3/5/21 12:56 PM, Demented Old Joe wrote:   
   >>>>>> [JThomQ incoherent bullshit snipped]   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> These days the Democrats believe that they control the message.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You can't even say what that's supposed to mean. It's just right-wingnut   
   >>>> whinging and blubbering.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There is a saying that I find grating and irritating, and I don't believe   
   >>>> it: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias." Stephen Colbert, a snide   
   >>>> snarky asshole, said that at the White House Correspondents' Association   
   >>>> dinner in 2006 (what the fuck was he even doing there?)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The expression is an overstatement. It is not accurate to say that   
   reality   
   >>>> has a liberal ("progressive") bias. Rather, reality has an   
   >>>> *anti*-right-wingnut bias.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Conservatives — that is, contemporary knuckle-dragging far-right-wingnut   
   >>>> reactionaries — are known to believe things that are easily shown to be   
   >>>> false. For example:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * Barack Obama wasn’t born in the United States   
   >>>> * Hillary Clinton was involved in a pedophilia ring in the basement   
   of a   
   >>>> pizza   
   >>>> parlor that doesn’t have a basement   
   >>>> * Climate change is a Chinese hoax   
   >>>> * Unemployment rose under Obama   
   >>>> * Evolution isn’t real but creationism is   
   >>>> * Robert E. Lee was a patriotic American   
   >>>> * A good guy with a gun is necessary to stop a bad guy with a gun   
   >>>> * Mass murderers who are people of color are terrorists, while white   
   mass   
   >>>> murderers are simply uniquely stressed individuals.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You don't have to be a liberal or "progressive" to be able to see that   
   these   
   >>>> standard right-wingnut beliefs are false. Reality doesn't need to have,   
   and   
   >>>> *DOES NOT* have, a "liberal" bias. Rather, reality has an anti-bullshit   
   >>>> bias, and right-wingnuts have an astonishing tendency to believe bullshit,   
   >>>> so reality works against them.   
   >>>   
   >>> The fact that you believe the above to be "standard right wing beliefs"   
   >>   
   >> They are. This is proved.   
   >>   
   >> Oh, and here's another: "Trump won the election." He didn't.    
   Right-wingnuts are irrational.   
   >   
   > Actually it isn't   
      
   Actually it is. As I said, this is proved.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca