XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: notgenx32@gmail.com   
      
   On 3/6/2021 12:01 PM, Kurtsie Nicklas, the Shame of Burlington NC, and *well   
   known* to the Burlington police because of her numerous complaints about   
   domestic violence by her boyfriend, and the most notorious male whore of   
   Burlington, lied:   
      
   > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 11:51:10 -0800, Prof. Rudy Canoza the intellectual, moral   
   and physical superior to *both* little Kurtsie and kleine klauschen, wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 3/6/2021 11:45 AM, Kurtsie Nicklas, the Shame of Burlington NC, and   
   *well known* to the Burlington police because of her numerous complaints about   
   domestic violence by her boyfriend, and the most notorious male whore of   
   Burlington, lied:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:33:37 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 11:17:26 -0800, Prof. Rudy Canoza, the intellectual,   
   moral and physical superior to *both* little Kurtsie and kleine klauschen,   
   wrote:   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 3/6/2021 10:18 AM, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:36:32 -0800, Prof. Rudy Canoza, the intellectual,   
   moral and physical superior to *both* little Kurtsie and kleine klauschen,   
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Political polarization is spurring partisans to extremes, but   
   there’s a simple   
   >>>>>>> change Congress could make to reverse this alarming trend: mandate   
   that its   
   >>>>>>> members be elected by a majority of votes.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Americans probably think the law already requires this, given the   
   Founders’   
   >>>>>>> reverence for majority rule as an element of self-government. Yet all   
   but six   
   >>>>>>> states permit plurality winners, meaning that federal lawmakers can be   
   elected   
   >>>>>>> even if they do not secure more than 50 percent of the general   
   election vote.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> States are generally authorized to set their own voting rules. But   
   requiring   
   >>>>>>> that a candidate win a majority in the general election is fully within   
   >>>>>>> Congress’s constitutional power. Article I, Section 4 empowers   
   Congress to “at   
   >>>>>>> any time by Law make or alter” any “Regulations” concerning the   
   “Manner of   
   >>>>>>> holding Elections for Senators and Representatives.”   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Imposing this requirement would be healthy for democracy not only   
   because, by   
   >>>>>>> definition, it would produce results that a majority of voters want   
   — it would   
   >>>>>>> also help elect more moderates from both parties, officeholders   
   predisposed to   
   >>>>>>> working across the aisle to legislate in the public interest.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> *ALL* elective offices, including the presidency, should be won by the   
   person   
   >>>>>>> obtaining a majority of the votes.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      Then change the Constitution if you can?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Your question mark is wrong — another proof of your illiteracy.  You   
   are   
   >>>>> illiterate and stupid, and we don't take analysis or instruction from   
   stupid   
   >>>>> people like you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You can always tell when Rudy is   
   >>   
   >   
   > Why the pretence   
      
   No pretense.  Write "pretense," Kirsten, with an 's' and not a 'c.'  You don't   
   speak or write British English (can scarcely be said you write English at all).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)