Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,052 of 44,666    |
|    Just Wondering to Rudy Canoza    |
|    Re: Constitutional amendments for presid    |
|    15 Mar 21 23:41:56    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio       .christian.roman-catholic       XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: JW@jw.com              On 3/15/2021 7:33 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:       > The ideal amendment, of course, would abolish the electoral college and       > implement a direct popular vote for president. That's how the president       > should be determined.       >> Failing that, there needs to be an amendment that does three things:       > 1. Abolish the ability of state legislatures to appoint electors       > 2. Mandate that states conduct elections in which the voters in the state       > determine the electors       > 3. Require that a candidate receive an absolute majority of votes in order       > to win the electors of the state; this part of the amendment probably       > should mandate ranked-choice or "instant runoff" so that only one       > election need be held       > This absolutely should happen.              If you truly believe that, you know what to do. Quitcherbitchin in       newsgroups, get out there and use your best efforts to get your       precious constitutional amendment ratified. Nobody's stopping       you. In fact, I encourage you to try. Let us know how it works       out for you.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca