XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: notgenx32@gmail.com   
      
   On 3/18/2021 9:40 AM, Mattb wrote:   
   > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:02:45 -0700, Bill Flett    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 3/17/2021 8:26 PM, Mattb wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:16:42 -0700, Bill Flett    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 3/17/2021 3:47 PM, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:10:42 -0700, Bill Flett    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 3/17/2021 3:04 PM, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:24:57 -0700, Bill Flett    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 3/17/2021 10:45 AM, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:47:52 -0400, P+Barker    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Bill Flett  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Citizens do *NOT* all have equal access to IDs (no apostrophe, you   
   stupid   
   >>>>>>>>>>> illiterate fuck).  That's the whole problem.  The Republiscums are   
   fully aware   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that it is *inherently* harder for poor people, who are   
   disproportionately   
   >>>>>>>>>>> minority, to get the required ID.  As if that isn't bad enough,   
   they then erect   
   >>>>>>>>>>> *additional* barriers to make it even harder to obtain the ID.    
   They do this in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the full knowledge that it will suppress the votes of poor   
   minorities, who tend   
   >>>>>>>>>>> to vote Democratic.  They *admit* that that's why they're doing it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It's racist.  This is proved beyond rational dispute.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> What is so difficult about getting a picture ID?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>        I've been asking him   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I've explained fully.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>      No Rudy you haven't.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I have.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Not in English   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In English.  I have explained fully in English.  It's not my fault you're   
   >>>> illiterate.   
   >>>   
   >>>     The [sic] do so here.   
   >>   
   >> I already have done.   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This is the point at which you've conceded defeat.   
   >>>   
   >>>    Defeat how?   
   >>   
   >> I was right.   
   >   
   >   
   > No,   
      
   Yes.  You're at the point now where you are only blabbering childish insults.   
   That's the point at which you concede defeat.   
      
   > you fear an honest debate   
      
   No.  You aren't an honest debater.  You pose questions that have already been   
   answered, and you've seen the answers, but because the answers weren't given in   
   reply to your posts, you ask the same things again.  That's dishonest.   
      
   The debate has already been held, with no contribution from you (because you're   
   a stupid illiterate ignorant shitbag), and your side lost.  Now you're just   
   doing "nyah-nyah-nyah," which is what you always end up doing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)