home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 43,109 of 44,666   
   BeamMeUpScotty to Rudy Canoza   
   Re: Government To Require "Porn Filters"   
   24 Mar 21 13:13:43   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 3/24/21 1:01 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   > On 3/24/2021 9:40 AM, Lee wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Utah governor signs divisive   
   >> measure to require porn filters   
   >> on all cellphones and tablets   
   >> Mar 24   
   >>   
   >> SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah is   
   >> a step closer to requiring all   
   >> cellphones and tablets sold in   
   >> the conservative state to   
   >> automatically block pornography   
   >> after the Republican governor   
   >> signed legislation Tuesday   
   >> that critics call a significant   
   >> intrusion of free speech.   
   >   
   > You don't really care about government intrusion into what should be   
   > private choices and decisions.  California won't let me choose the   
   > showerhead I want. The Clinton regime already introduced a 2.5 GPM limit   
   > — by fiat, of course — in 2012.  California reduced that to 2.0 GPM in   
   > 2015, and again to 1.8 GPM in 2018.  You support this kind of   
   > nanny-state heavy-handed regulation.   
   >   
   > I just bought a 2.0 GPM showerhead even though they're not for sale   
   > here.  I had it shipped to a friend in another state, who then shipped   
   > it to me.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Gov. Spencer Cox has said the   
   >> measure would send an “important   
   >> message” about preventing children   
   >> from accessing explicit online   
   >> content. The proposal is the latest   
   >> move in Utah’s legislative campaign   
   >> to curb the availability of porn.   
   >>   
   >> The measure won’t go into effect   
   >> unless five other states enact   
   >> similar laws, a provision that was   
   >> added to address concerns that it   
   >> would be difficult to implement.   
   >>   
   >> https://www.wtrf.com/news/national-news/utah-governor-signs-divisive-mea   
   >> sure-to-require-porn-filters-on-all-cellphones-and-tablets/   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   This way the government can filter anything they don't want you to see?   
      
   --   
   That's karma   
      
   Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the   
   Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that   
   even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to*   
   *reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they   
   control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will*   
   *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same   
   things protect you from crime and violence?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca