Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,109 of 44,666    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to Rudy Canoza    |
|    Re: Government To Require "Porn Filters"    |
|    24 Mar 21 13:13:43    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio       .christian.roman-catholic       XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov              On 3/24/21 1:01 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:       > On 3/24/2021 9:40 AM, Lee wrote:       >>       >>       >> Utah governor signs divisive       >> measure to require porn filters       >> on all cellphones and tablets       >> Mar 24       >>       >> SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah is       >> a step closer to requiring all       >> cellphones and tablets sold in       >> the conservative state to       >> automatically block pornography       >> after the Republican governor       >> signed legislation Tuesday       >> that critics call a significant       >> intrusion of free speech.       >       > You don't really care about government intrusion into what should be       > private choices and decisions. California won't let me choose the       > showerhead I want. The Clinton regime already introduced a 2.5 GPM limit       > — by fiat, of course — in 2012. California reduced that to 2.0 GPM in       > 2015, and again to 1.8 GPM in 2018. You support this kind of       > nanny-state heavy-handed regulation.       >       > I just bought a 2.0 GPM showerhead even though they're not for sale       > here. I had it shipped to a friend in another state, who then shipped       > it to me.       >       >>       >> Gov. Spencer Cox has said the       >> measure would send an “important       >> message” about preventing children       >> from accessing explicit online       >> content. The proposal is the latest       >> move in Utah’s legislative campaign       >> to curb the availability of porn.       >>       >> The measure won’t go into effect       >> unless five other states enact       >> similar laws, a provision that was       >> added to address concerns that it       >> would be difficult to implement.       >>       >> https://www.wtrf.com/news/national-news/utah-governor-signs-divisive-mea       >> sure-to-require-porn-filters-on-all-cellphones-and-tablets/       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >       This way the government can filter anything they don't want you to see?              --       That's karma              Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the       Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that       even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to*       *reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they       control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will*       *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same       things protect you from crime and violence?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca