home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 43,248 of 44,666   
   Rudy Canoza to David Hartung   
   Re: Why do Hartung and the other right-w   
   03 Jun 21 09:19:56   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: j__carlson@gmx.com   
      
   [followups vandalism by shitbag *LYING* *PHILANDERING* *ZERO-time-value*   
   pastor-to-the-KKK repaired]   
      
   On 6/3/2021 7:05 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   > On 6/2/21 12:37 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> Well?  Does anyone have any idea?  There is no dispute that they do it.   
   >> Hartung is the worst at it.  He mostly posts content-free suck-off replies   
   to   
   >> Kurtsie Nicklas, the boy whore of Burlington NC, and to Kremlin Girl / Bit   
   of   
   >> Nothingness.  KG/BoN, of course, posts suck-off replies to *herself*.   
   >>   
   >> Why do they do it?  How can they think it's a good use of their time?   
   Could it   
   >> be...that they know their time has no value?   
   >   
   > Why do our   
      
   Evasion noted.  Answer my question:  why do you post suck-off replies to your   
   fellow knuckle-dragging right-wingnuts?  How in the hell can you consider it 1)   
   meaningful, and 2) a good use of your time?  They're meaningless and they're   
   *not* a good use of your time.  Do they make you feel better about yourself?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca