Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,248 of 44,666    |
|    Rudy Canoza to David Hartung    |
|    Re: Why do Hartung and the other right-w    |
|    03 Jun 21 09:19:56    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio       .christian.roman-catholic       XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: j__carlson@gmx.com              [followups vandalism by shitbag *LYING* *PHILANDERING* *ZERO-time-value*       pastor-to-the-KKK repaired]              On 6/3/2021 7:05 AM, David Hartung wrote:       > On 6/2/21 12:37 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:       >> Well? Does anyone have any idea? There is no dispute that they do it.       >> Hartung is the worst at it. He mostly posts content-free suck-off replies       to       >> Kurtsie Nicklas, the boy whore of Burlington NC, and to Kremlin Girl / Bit       of       >> Nothingness. KG/BoN, of course, posts suck-off replies to *herself*.       >>       >> Why do they do it? How can they think it's a good use of their time?       Could it       >> be...that they know their time has no value?       >       > Why do our              Evasion noted. Answer my question: why do you post suck-off replies to your       fellow knuckle-dragging right-wingnuts? How in the hell can you consider it 1)       meaningful, and 2) a good use of your time? They're meaningless and they're       *not* a good use of your time. Do they make you feel better about yourself?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca