home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 43,263 of 44,666   
    to Rudy Canoza   
   Re: Instruction for stupid, plodding, kn   
   08 Jun 21 22:03:15   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: uiop@pol.com   
      
   Rudy Canoza wrote:   
      
   > On 6/8/2021 2:40 PM, uiop@pol.com wrote:   
   > > Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > On 6/8/2021 5:24 AM, uiop@pol.com wrote:   
   > > > > Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > I'm probably wasting my time, because stupid, plodding,   
   > > > > > knuckle-dragging right-wingnuts are not amenable to   
   > > > > > instruction and learning.  Nonetheless, ethics and decency   
   > > > > > compel me to attempt it.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > typo — a simple keying error.  You mean to key, for example,   
   > > > > > "error," but your fingers malfunction and instead you key   
   > > > > > "eror," "errot," "errir," or something like that.  It often   
   > > > > > comes from striking an adjacent key, or from thinking you   
   > > > > > pressed the correct key but you didn't press it firmly   
   > > > > > enough.  These are usually excusable.  They are not excusable   
   > > > > > when the correct key is on the opposite side of the keyboard.   
   > > > > > Hartung does a lot of these.  He'll key 'i' for 'e' or   
   > > > > > vice-versa, and those are on opposite sides of the keyboard   
   > > > > > and struck with fingers on different hands.  Keying 'i' for   
   > > > > > 'e' or vice-versa is not a typo — it's a fuck-up.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > thoughto — this occurs most often with homonyms (which,   
   > > > > > contrary to most right-wingnuts' beliefs, are not pseudonyms   
   > > > > > for homos).  For example, I absolutely and without any   
   > > > > > rational dispute know the difference between   
   > > > > > there/their/they're, to/too/two, your/you're, etc.   
   > > > > > Nonetheless, I occasionally absent mindedly key the wrong   
   > > > > > one.  That's a thoughto.  When you see a complete illiterate   
   > > > > > like little matteeeeB, who always uses the wrong one, you   
   > > > > > know it's not a thoughto, but illiteracy.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > grammaro — for me, these are almost always due to incomplete   
   > > > > > editing and revision.  I'll sometimes key up a sentence with a   
   > > > > > singular subject, and of course my adjectives and verb tenses   
   > > > > > always agree with the number and gender of the subject.   
   > > > > > However, I then revise the text, and — for example — change   
   > > > > > the subject from singular to plural.  On occasion, I forget   
   > > > > > to change the person/number of the adjectives or verbs.  I'll   
   > > > > > start with a third person singular subject and third person   
   > > > > > singular verb, then revise the subject to third person plural   
   > > > > > but forget to change the verb.  This is a grammaro.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Thoughto and grammaro are my excellent neologisms.  People   
   > > > > > like Kurtsie Nicklas, the boy whore of Burlington NC, or   
   > > > > > AlleyPussyBitch, who piss and moan about my neologisms (on   
   > > > > > which I have already instructed them), and who don't know the   
   > > > > > word "neologism," are only demonstrating their ignorance when   
   > > > > > they piss and moan about the excellent neologisms.  If they   
   > > > > > had a lick of sense, which clearly they don't, they would   
   > > > > > adopt the neologisms and use them, because they fuck up their   
   > > > > > text all the time, and in a few cases, they could possibly   
   > > > > > explain away the fuck-ups by invoking the neologisms.  But   
   > > > > > they're too fucking stupid for that.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > I'm smarter — by far — than both Kurtsie and AlleyPussyBitch.   
   > > > > > And they KNOW it, too.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Your neologisms are not legit if you're the only person on   
   > > > > Earth who uses them.   
   > > >   
   > > > I'm not the only one who uses them, "Fix-it guy at Citco."  Pretty   
   > > > obviously, Stain, you don't know what a neologism is.   
   > >   
   > > Oh really- who else then?   
   > >   
   >   
   > Some English professors I know and a couple of economists, "Fix it   
   > guy at Citco."   
      
   Are they all you?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca