XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: js@phendrie.con   
      
   On 6/25/2021 7:40 AM, B Hasselback wrote:   
   > On Friday, June 25, 2021 at 9:32:26 AM UTC-5, David Hartung wrote:   
   >> On 6/25/21 9:03 AM, Bill Flett wrote:   
   >>> On 6/25/2021 3:54 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>> Granted it does not deal with what to do should one be elected by   
   >>>> fraudulent means, except that such fraud constitutes a "high crime".   
   >>>   
   >>> No, it does not constitute any fraud by the person you want to remove.   
   >>>   
   >>> In any case, if President Biden were to leave office for any reason,   
   >>> Kamala Harris, not the orange fat fuck, would become president. And if   
   >>> she were removed, then it would be the speaker of the house. The orange   
   >>> fat fuck *cannot* be put back into the presidency except by being sworn   
   >>> in on Jan 20, 2025, assuming he's still alive.   
   >> Had you read my entire post, you would know that I made that point,   
   >> although I did it in a rational non-vulgar manner.   
   >   
   > No you didn't...you tried to make it look like you're not too sure about the   
   constitutionality of "reinstating" Trump, but want it to happen because you're   
   a QAnon fanatic.   
   >   
      
   There are only two ways Hartung could have posted that bullshit:   
      
   1.  It's a pure troll.  In the troll scenario, as stupid as Hartung is, and   
        that's pretty fucking stupid, he knows that the fuckwit Boris Epshsteyn   
        ["Trump 2020 Strategic Adviser," haw haw haw!] is simply bullshitting, and   
        what he is saying does *NOT* constitute "an interesting thought."   
      
        Every word Epshsteyn said about the "Constitution" is actually only   
        applicable to the Bill of Rights, and the Bill of Rights does not address   
        the election and inauguration of the president in any way.  This fucking   
        Russian (what a surprise — NOT!) is a graduate of Georgetown law school.   
        For him to have this utter lack of awareness of the Constitution is   
        appalling.   
      
   2.  Hartung out-stupided himself again.  He actually thinks Epshsteyn might be   
        onto something with this cockamamie bullshit, and he genuinely, if   
   stupidly,   
        thinks it's "an interesting thought."  But of course, 100% wrong bullshit   
   is   
        *never* an interesting thought, so Hartung thinking it is is a reflection   
        of Hartung's profound, willful and *aggressive* stupidity.   
      
      
   Hartung actually is both a troll and a profoundly, willfully and *aggressively*   
   stupid fuckwit.  He's a troll because every original post he makes, 100% of   
   them, is posted not to initiate a reasonable discussion, but to inflame and   
   antagonize "leftists."  He's a profoundly, willfully and *aggressively* stupid   
   fuckwit because he really believes all this right-wingnut lie site garbage.   
      
   Beyond being a troll and a profoundly, willfully and *aggressively* stupid   
   fuckwit, Hartung is an un-Christian shitbag.  Jesus would condemn Hartung for   
   his shitbaggery.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)