XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: notgenx32@gmail.com   
      
   On 6/25/2021 9:40 AM, B Hasselback wrote:   
   > On Friday, June 25, 2021 at 11:37:57 AM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> On 6/25/2021 9:34 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>> On 6/25/21 11:16 AM, Jonathan wrote:   
   >>>> On 6/25/2021 10:32 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>>> On 6/25/21 9:03 AM, Bill Flett wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 6/25/2021 3:54 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Granted it does not deal with what to do should one be elected by   
   >>>>>>> fraudulent means, except that such fraud constitutes a "high crime".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No, it does not constitute any fraud by the person you want to remove.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> In any case, if President Biden were to leave office for any reason,   
   Kamala   
   >>>>>> Harris, not the orange fat fuck, would become president. And if she were   
   >>>>>> removed, then it would be the speaker of the house. The orange fat fuck   
   >>>>>> *cannot* be put back into the presidency except by being sworn in on   
   Jan 20,   
   >>>>>> 2025, assuming he's still alive.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Had you read my entire post, you would know that I made that point,   
   although   
   >>>>> I did it in a rational non-vulgar manner.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> January 6 was the day the election formally ended   
   >>>> and was certified, lock, stock and barrel.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Which is why Trump sent his goons in to stop it   
   >>>> on that day, it wasn't a coincidence.   
   >>>> It was Trump's last chance.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Are you really that naive?   
   >>>   
   >>> I at least realize that there is no evidence to support your claim that   
   Trump   
   >>> "sent his goons in".   
   >>>   
   >> There are *mountains* of evidence, and it is not in rational dispute. It is   
   the   
   >> conclusion of history. Trump organized and ordered that insurrection. We   
   know   
   >> this.   
   >   
   > One can make a case for Trump and his Jan 6th traitors to be executed via   
   public hanging.  Not sure, but it's an interesting thought, isn't it?   
   >   
      
   It would be very satisfying and there would be an element of justice in it, but   
   neither sedition nor insurrection are capital crimes under U.S. law.  Sedition   
   carries a maximum penalty of 20 years, insurrection has a max of 10 years.   
      
   > See, this is how Hartung justifies his ridiculous opinions...he's not SURE,   
   but it's certainly INTERESTING and should be EXAMINED.   
   >   
      
   Yes, Hartung always tries to buy himself some wiggle room that way.  Of course,   
   it's transparently obvious that he *believes*, or at least wants to believe,   
   the   
   bullshit he posts.   
      
   Say!  Regarding something being "interesting" and should be "examined" (or   
   "checked"):  Isn't that what Trump said about injecting bleach and rubbing   
   alcohol into COVID-19 patients?  Yes, it is:   
      
      
   Acting Homeland Security undersecretary   
   William ("Bill") Bryan:  We’re also testing disinfectants readily   
   available.  We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the   
   virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids.  And I can tell   
   you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol   
   will kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no   
   rubbing — just spraying it on and letting it go.  You rub it and it goes   
   away even faster. We’re also looking at other disinfectants,   
   specifically looking at the COVID-19 virus in saliva.   
      
   Trump:  Thank you, Bill.   
      
   Q (reporter):  Mr. Bryan -   
      
   Trump:  Thank you very much.  So I asked Bill a question that probably   
   some of you are thinking of, if you’re totally into that world, which I   
   find to be very interesting.  So, supposing we hit the body with a   
   tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and   
   I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test   
   it.  And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body,   
   which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I   
   think you said you’re going to test that too.  It sounds interesting.   
      
   Bryan:  We’ll get to the right folks who could.   
      
   Trump:  Right.  And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out   
   in a minute.  One minute.  And is there a way we can do something like   
   that, *by injection inside* or almost a cleaning.  Because you see it   
   gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs.  So it   
   would be interesting to check that.  So, that, you’re going to have to   
   use medical doctors with.  But it sounds — it sounds interesting to me.   
      
      
   Trump *absolutely* advocated "check[ing]" the usefulness of disinfectants   
   (bleach and rubbing alcohol specifically mentioned) "by injection inside."  It   
   "sounds interesting" to him.  Trump also wanted to "check" getting light inside   
   the body, "either through the skin or in some other way." *What* "other way"   
   was   
   Trump imagining?   
      
   Trump is stupid.  Only a fucked-up Mississippi-stupid fuckwit like Hartung   
   could   
   consider Trump smart.  Trump isn't smart, he's stupid.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)