home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 43,319 of 44,666   
   Rudy Canoza to Ted   
   Re: wydell will never understand wealth    
   27 Jun 21 14:16:28   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: cap@philhendrie.con   
      
   On 6/27/2021 1:09 PM, Ted wrote:   
   > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:31:18 -0700, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
   >> On 6/17/2021 1:29 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> > I start a software company that is wildly successful.  The   
   > software is used by   
   >> > millions and it greatly improves their welfare.  They happily buy   
   > the software   
   >> > because their welfare improvement is greater than from any   
   > alternate use of the   
   >> > money.  That means they're better off.  I'm better off because   
   > they give me   
   >> > their money.  The company goes public, and my shares become worth   
   > billions.   
   >> > > wydell is no worse off than before I started the company (unless   
   > she had a   
   >> > competing company that went bust because mine took all the market   
   > share, and   
   >> > that's absolutely inconceivable).  She may even be better off if   
   > she bought my   
   >> > excellent product and made her life better.   
   >> > > wydell has no legitimate reason to be unhappy with my increase in   
   > wealth, given   
   >> > that it didn't come at her expense.  And she has NO valid claim   
   > on any part of   
   >> > my wealth.  She can start her own   
   >> > company and see if she can do the sam   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >> Sorry, I inadvertently sent it the first time   
   >> with TardBlock® enabled, which means she wouldn't be able to see it.  I   
   >> have temporarily disabled it.   
   >   
   >   
   > LOL! I haven't used that in a while.   
      
   It's a good tool to have available.  I'm working on adding a button to   
   Thunderbird to make it easier to toggle TardBlock® on or off.  Right now, it's   
   kind of a pain in the ass.   
      
   --   
   TardBlock® temporarily disabled   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca