XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio   
   .christian.roman-catholic   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: js@phendrie.con   
      
   Spermman wrote, "Trump's Fundraiser Is Unconstitutional."  By "fundraiser," he   
   means Trump's suits against Twitter, Facebook and Google, and their CEOs.  That   
   is a spot-on correct characterization of the suits.  What is not correct is   
   that   
   the suits are "unconstitutional."  They are not.  Anyone has an absolute   
   constitutional right to file any lawsuit he wishes, no matter how meritless it   
   is, as Trump's plainly are.  The suits will, of course, get chucked out,   
   because   
   Trump's claim that the platforms' expulsion of him is "unconstitutional" is   
   absurd.  But the suits themselves are not unconstitutional.  That's just   
   stupid.   
      
   Of course, Spermman also wrote this nugget of idiotic bullshit:   
      
       "Oakland, the most successfully integrated city in the USA.  Hella proud".   
       Bradley K. Spermman   
       https://twitter.com/bradleyksherman   
      
   so the bullshit about Trump's suits should come as no surprise.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)