Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,389 of 44,666    |
|    Rudy Canoza to All    |
|    Hartung's lies about the Jan 06 insurrec    |
|    28 Jul 21 09:44:43    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio       .christian.roman-catholic       XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: js@phendrie.con              It was an insurrection, no matter how hard Hartung stamps his dainty foot and       claims it wasn't.              But why won't Hartung say what he thinks they *were* doing? Why were they       breaking into the closed Capitol? Why were they shouting "Hang Mike Pence"?       Why were they looking for Nancy Pelosi while menacingly saying "Oh,       NAN-cee..."?                     "Capitol rioters searched for Nancy Pelosi in a way that should make every       woman’s skin crawl"       https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/nancy-pelosi-capi       ol-insurrection-footage-impeachment-trial/2021/02/10/34bb843c-6b       c-11eb-9f80-3d7646ce1bc0_story.html                     Hartung is lying about what that mob was, whose orders they were acting upon,       and what they were trying to achieve. What they were trying to achieve was       *illegally* to keep Trump in office. That is not in rational dispute.       Hartung's lies are not rational disputation, they're just fucking lies.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca