Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,449 of 44,666    |
|    Rudy Canoza to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Biden_violates_his_oath_of_off    |
|    11 Aug 21 11:23:49    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.trump, alt.religio       .christian.roman-catholic       XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: js@phendrie.con              By Jonah Goldberg | Columnist       Aug. 10, 2021 3:10 AM PT              President Biden has already violated his oath of office. The good news for him:       He’s in fine company.              In 2002, President George W. Bush signed the McCain-Feingold campaign finance       bill into law. At the ceremony, he expressed his “concerns” that the law he       signed “restrains the speech of a wide variety of groups on issues of public       import in the months closest to an election.” He added, deflecting from his       own       responsibilities, “I expect that the courts will resolve these legitimate       legal       questions as appropriate under the law.”              Between 2011 and 2014, President Obama said, over and over again, that he could       not unilaterally overturn or subvert laws passed by Congress and change the       immigration status of “Dreamers.” “I’m not a king. I am the head of the       executive branch of government. I’m required to follow the law,” he said in       January 2013. A month later, he reiterated that view: “I’m not the emperor       of       the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed, and Congress       right       now has not changed what I consider to be a broken immigration system.”              Then, in November 2014, he signed an executive order doing it anyway.              We can skip President Trump’s track record on violations of the oath of       office,       since he was impeached twice.              And now there’s Biden. Last week, his administration issued a “new”       moratorium       on renter evictions, essentially reissuing the one imposed by the Centers for       Disease Control and Prevention in September as a public health measure during       the pandemic. The Supreme Court said in June that the CDC had no authority to       issue a nationwide moratorium. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the       majority, told the administration that it could let the old moratorium expire       on       July 31 rather than eliminate it immediately, since it had only weeks left on       the clock. If the administration wanted a new moratorium after July, he said       “clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation) would       be       necessary.”              On July 31, the moratorium expired without congressional action. On Aug. 2,       White House advisor Gene Sperling was asked if the administration could       unilaterally extend the moratorium. His answer was that it couldn’t find       legal       authority to do so.              “The bulk of the constitutional scholarship says that it’s not likely to       pass       constitutional muster,” Biden conceded a day later. Yet, he added, “at a       minimum, by the time it gets litigated, it will probably give some additional       time while we’re getting that $45 billion out to people who are, in fact,       behind       in the rent and don’t have the money.”              This is no way to run a constitutional republic.              The president takes an oath to “faithfully execute” the laws and to       “preserve,       protect, and defend” the Constitution. Biden, Bush and Obama, by their own       admission, believed their actions ran afoul of the law and/or the Constitution.       But politically, it was easier to pass the trash to the Supreme Court so the       court could take the political heat.              You can be sure that when the court invalidates this new moratorium, Democrats       —       and probably some Republicans who’ve kept their heads down in all of this       — will       feign outrage at the court’s “callousness.”              But we should all be outraged by the cowardice of elected politicians who find       their jobs too difficult to do within the bounds of their oaths.              https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-08-10/covid-rent-evic       ion-moratorium-biden-cdc              See also:       "Biden's Eviction Moratorium Defies the Rule of Law"              https://reason.com/2021/08/11/bidens-eviction-moratorium-defies-       he-rule-of-law/?fbclid=IwAR1qdEW8DP_gbUVyd6_cTr5g0Miin1uqlppTgp6       1Vj-d61mGJYdL_oHWSo                     The eviction moratorium is unconstitutional and illegal. Leftists don't care       —       proggies don't merely hate our Constitution, they despise the very notion of       constitutional governance.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca