Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 43,883 of 44,666    |
|    David Brooks to -hh    |
|    Re: The Top 1% Pay Half Of All Taxes    |
|    22 Jun 24 13:59:47    |
      XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: DonQuixote@nomail.afraid.org              On 22/06/2024 11:58, -hh wrote:       > On 6/21/24 3:46 PM, David Brooks wrote:       >> On 21/06/2024 20:21, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:       >>> -hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:       >>>       >>>> TL;DR:       >>>> be honest and make comparisons based on total taxes, not just by       >>>> cherrypicking one individual tax within the whole.       >>>       >>> +1       >>>       >>> Still, recall that EXPOTUSSFB45 at one time paid more taxes to Chy-na       >>> than to the U.S.       >>       >> Are you referring to Ex-POTUS Donald Trump?       >       > That would be my guess too.       >       > In any event, that individual is an effective illustration how there's       > tons of income tax loopholes which enable the "1%" to pay lower net tax       > rates than much of America that basically aren't available to normal       > folk who get a W-2 from their employer. This is because there's a huge       > amount of latitude in what can be written off as a business expense that       > benefits the business owner.       >       > A huge one is in Real Estate, in that profits of a sale of a property       > are tax-deferred if it is reinvested in another property. Eventually,       > those profits become permanently tax-free when the owner dies: family       > gains generational wealth, as the first $12M of an Estate is Tax free.       >       > Similarly, business expense write-offs can offset: more meals become       > either a business comp or are a business expense written off as client       > entertainment - lowers one's daily costs of everyday life, so more       > income is retained instead of spent.       >       > Another one that's more relevant to some of these newsgroups has to do       > with personal computers: they're written off as a business expense       > which goes to zero after it has depreciated, at which point the business       > can hand off the old PC for free as a personal possession.       >       > Plus there's ways to "finesse" on this: after Fed accelerated       > depreciation has been taken (it was recently just 1 year), have the       > business incur a business expense to "pay" someone to recycle it, where       > this payment conveniently aligns perfectly with the remaining State       > depreciation. Business owner gets a 1 year old laptop for free, plus       > got paid to 'dispose' of it.       >       > Or outright cheating: business buys a new laptop to replace an existing       > PC, but keeps the old PC that it was supposedly replacing in service in       > the office: that new laptop goes to the owner's kid in college.       >       > And for both of these .. oops, we goofed on who pays the Office 365       > subscription! /s       >       >       > Recall also how Warren Buffet has commented about how his income tax       > rate was lower than his W2-earning secretary: that's typically due to       > income from Long Term Capital Gains & Qualified Dividends being taxed at       > rates lower than personal income (eg, 15% vs 24%).       >       >       > -hh              Good post, '-hh'! 😀              Thanks for your contribution.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca