home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 43,903 of 44,666   
   -hh to pothead   
   Re: Study: Vaccines had 'NO Beneficial E   
   08 Jul 24 13:34:03   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 7/7/24 7:54 PM, pothead wrote:   
   > On 2024-07-07, -hh  wrote:   
   >> On 7/6/24 8:33 PM, Joel wrote:   
   >>> pothead  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> My PCP when asked by me about the vax safety answered "do you want the   
   approved answer or my   
   >>>> opinion?"   
   >>>> I asked for her opinion.   
   >>>> She advised against it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And at the time she worked at the top hospital in the US for COVID.   
   >>>> Literally on the bleeding edge of the science.   
   >>>> I had already had the first shot but none after that one.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> She sounds like a redpiller dumbfuck.  There's such thing as   
   >>> overexertion of the mind.  Humility is key to being sane.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Another good question would be if that PCP is still alive & healthy   
   >> today and still has the same exact medical opinion ... or not.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   > Alive, healthy and well. In fact newly married and just had her first child.   
   As for her current   
   > medical opinion, that's actually a good question. I have a checkup in a few   
   weeks and will ask her.   
      
   The long answer here will be interesting, as the question of suitability   
   isn't a simple Y/N but a continuum which factors in multiple risk   
   elements, such as age, health, conflations, environment, etc.   
      
   For example, initially the shots weren't recommended for everyone   
   because there was a supply shortage, so they were prioritized to the   
   higher risks candidates.  Similarly, there were subgroups where testing   
   hadn't been completed yet (eg, pregnant women, babies/toddlers), so they   
   couldn't be recommended.   
      
      
   > FWIW, she is a brilliant doctor with more letters after her name than I can   
   remember which is why   
   > she was selected to work the cutting edge of the pandemic and with the most   
   seriously infected   
   > patients.   
   > For obvious reasons, I will not reveal her name, however a quick Google   
   shows that she was and has   
   > been at the forefront of COVID research and treatment.   
   > I did not know this when I signed her up to be my PCP. My regular PCP   
   retired and  She was   
   > recommended to me. This was at least 2 years before COVID.   
   >   
   > But your question is a good one so I will ask.   
   > I'm curious myself.   
      
   Should be a good conversation, particularly if it goes into general   
   form.  I look forward to it, as I've since retired from my HRPP IRB   
   position where we were discussing the research and ethics of the   
   pandemic's research status every 4-5 weeks for three years.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca