XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: pothead@snakebite.com   
      
   On 2024-07-08, -hh  wrote:   
   > On 7/7/24 7:54 PM, pothead wrote:   
   >> On 2024-07-07, -hh  wrote:   
   >>> On 7/6/24 8:33 PM, Joel wrote:   
   >>>> pothead  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> My PCP when asked by me about the vax safety answered "do you want the   
   approved answer or my   
   >>>>> opinion?"   
   >>>>> I asked for her opinion.   
   >>>>> She advised against it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And at the time she worked at the top hospital in the US for COVID.   
   >>>>> Literally on the bleeding edge of the science.   
   >>>>> I had already had the first shot but none after that one.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> She sounds like a redpiller dumbfuck.  There's such thing as   
   >>>> overexertion of the mind.  Humility is key to being sane.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Another good question would be if that PCP is still alive & healthy   
   >>> today and still has the same exact medical opinion ... or not.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> -hh   
   >>   
   >> Alive, healthy and well. In fact newly married and just had her first   
   child. As for her current   
   >> medical opinion, that's actually a good question. I have a checkup in a few   
   weeks and will ask her.   
   >   
   > The long answer here will be interesting, as the question of suitability   
   > isn't a simple Y/N but a continuum which factors in multiple risk   
   > elements, such as age, health, conflations, environment, etc.   
      
   Agree.   
   There was no cookie cutter one size fits all criteria.   
      
      
   > For example, initially the shots weren't recommended for everyone   
   > because there was a supply shortage, so they were prioritized to the   
   > higher risks candidates.  Similarly, there were subgroups where testing   
   > hadn't been completed yet (eg, pregnant women, babies/toddlers), so they   
   > couldn't be recommended.   
      
   True and agreed.   
      
   >   
   >   
   >> FWIW, she is a brilliant doctor with more letters after her name than I can   
   remember which is why   
   >> she was selected to work the cutting edge of the pandemic and with the most   
   seriously infected   
   >> patients.   
   >> For obvious reasons, I will not reveal her name, however a quick Google   
   shows that she was and has   
   >> been at the forefront of COVID research and treatment.   
   >> I did not know this when I signed her up to be my PCP. My regular PCP   
   retired and  She was   
   >> recommended to me. This was at least 2 years before COVID.   
   >>   
   >> But your question is a good one so I will ask.   
   >> I'm curious myself.   
   >   
   > Should be a good conversation, particularly if it goes into general   
   > form.  I look forward to it, as I've since retired from my HRPP IRB   
   > position where we were discussing the research and ethics of the   
   > pandemic's research status every 4-5 weeks for three years.   
   >   
   >   
   > -hh   
      
   I will ask and report back.   
   We are on the same page here hh.   
      
      
      
   --   
   pothead   
   Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.   
   Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.   
   Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)