XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 7/8/24 4:08 PM, pothead wrote:   
   > On 2024-07-08, -hh  wrote:   
   >> On 7/7/24 7:54 PM, pothead wrote:   
   >>> On 2024-07-07, -hh  wrote:   
   >>>> On 7/6/24 8:33 PM, Joel wrote:   
   >>>>> pothead  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> My PCP when asked by me about the vax safety answered "do you want the   
   approved answer or my   
   >>>>>> opinion?"   
   >>>>>> I asked for her opinion.   
   >>>>>> She advised against it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And at the time she worked at the top hospital in the US for COVID.   
   >>>>>> Literally on the bleeding edge of the science.   
   >>>>>> I had already had the first shot but none after that one.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She sounds like a redpiller dumbfuck.  There's such thing as   
   >>>>> overexertion of the mind.  Humility is key to being sane.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Another good question would be if that PCP is still alive & healthy   
   >>>> today and still has the same exact medical opinion ... or not.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> -hh   
   >>>   
   >>> Alive, healthy and well. In fact newly married and just had her first   
   child. As for her current   
   >>> medical opinion, that's actually a good question. I have a checkup in a   
   few weeks and will ask her.   
   >>   
   >> The long answer here will be interesting, as the question of suitability   
   >> isn't a simple Y/N but a continuum which factors in multiple risk   
   >> elements, such as age, health, conflations, environment, etc.   
   >   
   > Agree.   
   > There was no cookie cutter one size fits all criteria.   
   >   
   >   
   >> For example, initially the shots weren't recommended for everyone   
   >> because there was a supply shortage, so they were prioritized to the   
   >> higher risks candidates.  Similarly, there were subgroups where testing   
   >> hadn't been completed yet (eg, pregnant women, babies/toddlers), so they   
   >> couldn't be recommended.   
   >   
   > True and agreed.   
      
   Agreed.  My point here is that I was also not in the initial "vaccine   
   recommended" population groups, so I didn't get the vax then, but I was   
   in later (third?) "recommended" group, so I did.   
      
      
   >>> FWIW, she is a brilliant doctor with more letters after her name than I   
   can remember which is why   
   >>> she was selected to work the cutting edge of the pandemic and with the   
   most seriously infected   
   >>> patients.   
   >>> For obvious reasons, I will not reveal her name, however a quick Google   
   shows that she was and has   
   >>> been at the forefront of COVID research and treatment.   
   >>> I did not know this when I signed her up to be my PCP. My regular PCP   
   retired and  She was   
   >>> recommended to me. This was at least 2 years before COVID.   
   >>>   
   >>> But your question is a good one so I will ask.   
   >>> I'm curious myself.   
   >>   
   >> Should be a good conversation, particularly if it goes into general   
   >> form.  I look forward to it, as I've since retired from my HRPP IRB   
   >> position where we were discussing the research and ethics of the   
   >> pandemic's research status every 4-5 weeks for three years.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   > I will ask and report back.   
   > We are on the same page here hh.   
   >   
      
   Was glad to bring it to your attention; thanks.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)