Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,077 of 44,666    |
|    dolf to dolf    |
|    Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (2/5)    |
|    01 Jul 25 09:15:45    |
      [continued from previous message]              thoughts that skew our perception of events, situations, and ourselves."              But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation on       dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with ADHD who are       not only challenged by core symptoms—such as inattention and impulsivity       which is invariably animus associative—but they also often face       significant difficulties with emotional regulation. These challenges can       make them particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are       numerous but we only mention as a focussed context):              1. Executive Function and Self-Regulation Deficits: ADHD involves       deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that help       manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these processes falter,       individuals may struggle to evaluate their thoughts critically, allowing       distortions to flourish unchecked.              1. Heightened Emotional Reactivity: ADHD is frequently accompanied by       intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can intensify       distortions like emotional reasoning, where the feeling of distress is       mistaken for an objective truth."              COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho-social       cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics:              1. ADHD as a Miniature Cybernetic Society Think of each mind as its own       civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, processing them, and issuing       behavioral outputs. In ADHD the “sensing” (attention), “processing”       (executive function) and “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are       leaky. Just as a healthy polis relies on checks-and-balances, an ADHD       mind struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.              1. Executive Function Deficits = Weak Animus Arbitration In Jungian       terms, animus (assertive, boundary-setting principle) helps the psyche       say “no” to distractions and “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s       executive-function gaps—planning, working memory, impulse control—are       exactly a failure of that animus function. Without a robust internal       arbitrator, thoughts go unchecked: All-or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,       Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.              1. Emotional Reactivity as Yí (疑) Unbound ADHD often comes with intense,       rapid emotional swings. That hyper-reactivity maps to an amplified       yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient feedback—that congeals into distortions       like Emotional Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or       Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left alone,       these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or social       withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in civil society.              1. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) Inside the ADHD Mind • Jié—Formational       boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines that partition time, tasks,       and goals. When ADHD thins those boundaries, the mind drifts. •       Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that turn effort       into flow. Without repeated practice (or scaffolding), norms never       stick, and the system remains fluid to the point of chaos.              1. Facilitated Arbitration: External Cybernetic Interfaces Just as civil       society requires courts and assemblies, ADHD minds benefit from       anthropomorphic feedback loops—therapists, coaches, peer-support groups,       apps with nudges and reminders. These external agents stand in as       surrogate animus/anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines,       external structure) and building níng (by rewarding consistency) to       counteract yí’s drift.              Putting it together: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating       impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = erosion of animus       arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive yí (emotional       dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT, coaching, digital tools) =       external cybernetic nodes that restore jié & níng and tame yí       By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening everyday       arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent scaffolding, and       empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-correcting loops both within       the individual and in the wider social network.              Further avenues:       * Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to consciously       define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny wins to congeal new       norms (mini-níng).       * Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability training as       physiological arbitration complements.       * Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed pomodoro circles)       as macro-scale analogues of civil-society feedback."              DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC #1 -       SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] |       GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, 37, 52, 20, 71] PROTOTYPE ASSAY       METHOD we have identified (eg: the temporal heuristic notion #272 as       [#2, #70, #200] = bâʻar (H1197): KINDLE EMOTIVE RESPONSE can be noumena       redacted to #110 - qīng (清): PEACEFUL; PAY THE BILL / [#37, #73] which       is the antithesis of delinquency) within the #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC       / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE.              #1 - NOUS #67 @ zen:1,row:7,col:9 --> COGITO: #175       #2 - NOUS #54 @ zen:1,row:7,col:2       #3 - NOUS #47 @ zen:1,row:7,col:1       #4 - NOUS #48 @ zen:1,row:8,col:3       #5 - NOUS #7 @ zen:1,row:8,col:4       #6 - NOUS #5 @ zen:1,row:8,col:5       #7 - NOUS #3 @ zen:1,row:8,col:6       #8 - NOUS #70 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7       #9 - NOUS #68 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7              #67 #54 #47        #70 #68 #48       #03 #05 #07               #174 - The anima / animus: the feminine aspect of a man’s psyche (and       vice versa)       #336 - The personal unconscious: a collection of stored experiences       within the individual       #451 - The collective unconscious: a collection of universal images and       patterns within the collective psyche              Thusly it would behove us to give consideration to that discriminating       norm GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE       before modulation of any DAEMONIC can occur, there needs be some       understanding of the CYBERNETIC systems self-referencing, by       articulating the implicit epistemological / anthropological premise       accorded by the hierarchy of our morphological universe as #729       APPRAISALS + ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPES we are going to       formulate with a COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-trochos [James 3:6] starting       premise within the locus of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE (as shown above)."                     On 6/30/25 22:06, dolf wrote:       > An appropriate summary of the STATUE ARTIST interactions is conveyed by       > the CONTEST HEARING SPEAKING NOTES prepared for the 8 APRIL 2022 HEARING       > as refutation of VEXATIOUS THE GROUNDS TO AN APPLICATION FOR       > INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AS CASE NUMBER L10182359 AS       > INTERIM GRANTED 6 FEBRUARY 2020 and subject to a lack of procedural       > fairness (ie. WITHDRAWN BY POLICE PROSECUTIONS ON 14 JULY 2022)       > associated with those orders after a calculated wilful obstruction       > occurred to the EGRESS / INGRESS of my PRIVATE PROPERTY as then an       > impropriety for asserting there was a wilful intention to commit a       > BREACH (ie. being a "FALSE ALLEGATION OF PROXIMITY AND ACCOSTING"       > scenario @ 0829 HOURS on Sunday 21 MARCH 2021) to those ORDERS as CASE       > NUMBER M11048888 which was DETERMINED on 11 NOVEMBER 2021 despite my       > questioning the propriety of such action given the past matters related       > to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT (eg:       >       > NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected deployment of              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca