home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,077 of 44,666   
   dolf to dolf   
   Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (2/5)   
   01 Jul 25 09:15:45   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   thoughts that skew our perception of events, situations, and ourselves."   
      
   But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation on   
   dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with ADHD who are   
   not only challenged by core symptoms—such as inattention and impulsivity   
   which is invariably animus associative—but they also often face   
   significant difficulties with emotional regulation. These challenges can   
   make them particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are   
   numerous but we only mention as a focussed context):   
      
   1. Executive Function and Self-Regulation Deficits:
ADHD involves   
   deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that help   
   manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these processes falter,   
   individuals may struggle to evaluate their thoughts critically, allowing   
   distortions to flourish unchecked.   
      
   1. Heightened Emotional Reactivity:
ADHD is frequently accompanied by   
   intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can intensify   
   distortions like emotional reasoning, where the feeling of distress is   
   mistaken for an objective truth."   
      
   COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho-social   
   cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics:   
      
   1. ADHD as a Miniature Cybernetic Society Think of each mind as its own   
   civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, processing them, and issuing   
   behavioral outputs. In ADHD the “sensing” (attention), “processing”   
   (executive function) and “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are   
   leaky. Just as a healthy polis relies on checks-and-balances, an ADHD   
   mind struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.   
      
   1. Executive Function Deficits = Weak Animus Arbitration In Jungian   
   terms, animus (assertive, boundary-setting principle) helps the psyche   
   say “no” to distractions and “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s   
   executive-function gaps—planning, working memory, impulse control—are   
   exactly a failure of that animus function. Without a robust internal   
   arbitrator, thoughts go unchecked: All-or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,   
   Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.   
      
   1. Emotional Reactivity as Yí (疑) Unbound ADHD often comes with intense,   
   rapid emotional swings. That hyper-reactivity maps to an amplified   
   yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient feedback—that congeals into distortions   
   like Emotional Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or   
   Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left alone,   
   these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or social   
   withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in civil society.   
      
   1. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) Inside the ADHD Mind • Jié—Formational   
   boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines that partition time, tasks,   
   and goals. When ADHD thins those boundaries, the mind drifts. •   
   Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that turn effort   
   into flow. Without repeated practice (or scaffolding), norms never   
   stick, and the system remains fluid to the point of chaos.   
      
   1. Facilitated Arbitration: External Cybernetic Interfaces Just as civil   
   society requires courts and assemblies, ADHD minds benefit from   
   anthropomorphic feedback loops—therapists, coaches, peer-support groups,   
   apps with nudges and reminders. These external agents stand in as   
   surrogate animus/anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines,   
   external structure) and building níng (by rewarding consistency) to   
   counteract yí’s drift.   
      
   Putting it together: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating   
   impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = erosion of animus   
   arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive yí (emotional   
   dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT, coaching, digital tools) =   
   external cybernetic nodes that restore jié & níng and tame yí   
   By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening everyday   
   arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent scaffolding, and   
   empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-correcting loops both within   
   the individual and in the wider social network.   
      
   Further avenues:   
   * Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to consciously   
   define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny wins to congeal new   
   norms (mini-níng).   
   * Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability training as   
   physiological arbitration complements.   
   * Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed pomodoro circles)   
   as macro-scale analogues of civil-society feedback."   
      
   DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC #1 -   
   SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] |   
   GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, 37, 52, 20, 71] PROTOTYPE ASSAY   
   METHOD we have identified (eg: the temporal heuristic notion #272 as   
   [#2, #70, #200] = bâʻar (H1197): KINDLE EMOTIVE RESPONSE can be noumena   
   redacted to #110 - qīng (清): PEACEFUL; PAY THE BILL / [#37, #73] which   
   is the antithesis of delinquency) within the #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC   
   / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE.   
      
   #1 - NOUS #67 @ zen:1,row:7,col:9 --> COGITO: #175   
   #2 - NOUS #54 @ zen:1,row:7,col:2   
   #3 - NOUS #47 @ zen:1,row:7,col:1   
   #4 - NOUS #48 @ zen:1,row:8,col:3   
   #5 - NOUS #7 @ zen:1,row:8,col:4   
   #6 - NOUS #5 @ zen:1,row:8,col:5   
   #7 - NOUS #3 @ zen:1,row:8,col:6   
   #8 - NOUS #70 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7   
   #9 - NOUS #68 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7   
      
   #67	#54	#47		   
   #70	#68	#48   
   #03	#05	#07	   
      
   #174 - The anima / animus: the feminine aspect of a man’s psyche (and   
   vice versa)   
   #336 - The personal unconscious: a collection of stored experiences   
   within the individual   
   #451 - The collective unconscious: a collection of universal images and   
   patterns within the collective psyche   
      
   Thusly it would behove us to give consideration to that discriminating   
   norm GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE   
   before modulation of any DAEMONIC can occur, there needs be some   
   understanding of the CYBERNETIC systems self-referencing, by   
   articulating the implicit epistemological / anthropological premise   
   accorded by the hierarchy of our morphological universe as #729   
   APPRAISALS + ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPES we are going to   
   formulate with a COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-trochos [James 3:6] starting   
   premise within the locus of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE (as shown above)."   
      
      
   On 6/30/25 22:06, dolf wrote:   
   > An appropriate summary of the STATUE ARTIST interactions is conveyed by   
   > the CONTEST HEARING SPEAKING NOTES prepared for the 8 APRIL 2022 HEARING   
   > as refutation of VEXATIOUS THE GROUNDS TO AN APPLICATION FOR   
   > INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AS CASE NUMBER L10182359 AS   
   > INTERIM GRANTED 6 FEBRUARY 2020 and subject to a lack of procedural   
   > fairness (ie. WITHDRAWN BY POLICE PROSECUTIONS ON 14 JULY 2022)   
   > associated with those orders after a calculated wilful obstruction   
   > occurred to the EGRESS / INGRESS of my PRIVATE PROPERTY as then an   
   > impropriety for asserting there was a wilful intention to commit a   
   > BREACH (ie. being a "FALSE ALLEGATION OF PROXIMITY AND ACCOSTING"   
   > scenario @ 0829 HOURS on Sunday 21 MARCH 2021) to those ORDERS as CASE   
   > NUMBER M11048888 which was DETERMINED on 11 NOVEMBER 2021 despite my   
   > questioning the propriety of such action given the past matters related   
   > to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT (eg:   
   >   
   > NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected deployment of   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca