home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,081 of 44,666   
   dolf to dolf   
   Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (2/5)   
   01 Jul 25 18:32:39   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   > 1. Yí (疑) — Doubt or Deficiency—When Cybernetic Arbitration Falters   
   The   
   > character yí (疑) denotes doubt, hesitation, a failure of commitment.   
   > When the inner anima/animus dialogue calcifies or collapses—when one   
   > archetype dominates without counterbalance—the personality becomes   
   > one-sided, neurotic or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil society’s   
   > arbitration channels clog (courts overloaded, media captured, voices   
   > silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. Norms no longer congeal in   
   > shared trust but instead fragment into cynicism or apathy. Chronic yí   
   > manifests socially as delinquency (flouting the broken rules) or   
   > reprobation (moral exile from the public weal).   
   >   
   > 1. From Micro to Macro—A Unified View ­• Inner psyche = self-correcting   
   > system negotiating anima ↔ animus ­• Civil society = self-correcting   
   > system negotiating freedom ↔ order ­• Jié = structural boundary-making;   
   > Níng = normative cohesion ­• Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made   
   > humanly tangible ­• Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal   
   pathology   
   >   
   > In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what animus and   
   > anima enact within each of us: an ongoing arbitration of polarities   
   > through bounded form (jié) and collective cohesion (níng). When those   
   > cybernetic loops clog—when doubt (yí) ossifies rather than spurring   
   > inquiry—the result is disorders small (delinquency) or large (systemic   
   > breakdown, moral reprobation). Maintaining a vibrant civil society,   
   > then, means tending both our inner animus/anima balance and our external   
   > mechanisms of feedback, boundary and communal cement."   
   >   
   > DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty knowledge   
   > of others by making any physiological speculation from an extrapolation   
   > of metaphysical proposition such as "an ontic #22 - jié (結): formational   
   > (circumscribed as bounding) #135 -  níng (凝): congealing / [#56, #79]   
   > concept of facilitated arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC /   
   > ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses as attenuated   
   > #152 / #174 - yí (疑): deficiency / [#29, #61, #62, #22]" and neither can   
   > you proffer medical advice upon hypothetical postulates quantification   
   > of meta logic process on "cognitive distortions are biased, automatic   
   > thoughts that skew our perception of events, situations, and ourselves."   
   >   
   > But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation on   
   > dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with ADHD who are   
   > not only challenged by core symptoms—such as inattention and impulsivity   
   > which is invariably animus associative—but they also often face   
   > significant difficulties with emotional regulation. These challenges can   
   > make them particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are   
   > numerous but we only mention as a focussed context):   
   >   
   > 1. Executive Function and Self-Regulation Deficits:
ADHD involves   
   > deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that help   
   > manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these processes falter,   
   > individuals may struggle to evaluate their thoughts critically, allowing   
   > distortions to flourish unchecked.   
   >   
   > 1. Heightened Emotional Reactivity:
ADHD is frequently accompanied by   
   > intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can intensify   
   > distortions like emotional reasoning, where the feeling of distress is   
   > mistaken for an objective truth."   
   >   
   > COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho-social   
   > cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics:   
   >   
   > 1. ADHD as a Miniature Cybernetic Society Think of each mind as its own   
   > civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, processing them, and issuing   
   > behavioral outputs. In ADHD the “sensing” (attention), “processing”   
   > (executive function) and “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are   
   > leaky. Just as a healthy polis relies on checks-and-balances, an ADHD   
   > mind struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.   
   >   
   > 1. Executive Function Deficits = Weak Animus Arbitration In Jungian   
   > terms, animus (assertive, boundary-setting principle) helps the psyche   
   > say “no” to distractions and “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s   
   > executive-function gaps—planning, working memory, impulse control—are   
   > exactly a failure of that animus function. Without a robust internal   
   > arbitrator, thoughts go unchecked: All-or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,   
   > Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.   
   >   
   > 1. Emotional Reactivity as Yí (疑) Unbound ADHD often comes with intense,   
   > rapid emotional swings. That hyper-reactivity maps to an amplified   
   > yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient feedback—that congeals into distortions   
   > like Emotional Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or   
   > Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left alone,   
   > these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or social   
   > withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in civil society.   
   >   
   > 1. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) Inside the ADHD Mind • Jié—Formational   
   > boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines that partition time, tasks,   
   > and goals. When ADHD thins those boundaries, the mind drifts. •   
   > Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that turn effort   
   > into flow. Without repeated practice (or scaffolding), norms never   
   > stick, and the system remains fluid to the point of chaos.   
   >   
   > 1. Facilitated Arbitration: External Cybernetic Interfaces Just as civil   
   > society requires courts and assemblies, ADHD minds benefit from   
   > anthropomorphic feedback loops—therapists, coaches, peer-support groups,   
   > apps with nudges and reminders. These external agents stand in as   
   > surrogate animus/anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines,   
   > external structure) and building níng (by rewarding consistency) to   
   > counteract yí’s drift.   
   >   
   > Putting it together: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating   
   > impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = erosion of animus   
   > arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive yí (emotional   
   > dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT, coaching, digital tools)   
   =   
   > external cybernetic nodes that restore jié & níng and tame yí   
   > By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening everyday   
   > arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent scaffolding, and   
   > empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-correcting loops both within   
   > the individual and in the wider social network.   
   >   
   > Further avenues:   
   > * Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to consciously   
   > define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny wins to congeal new   
   > norms (mini-níng).   
   > * Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability training as   
   > physiological arbitration complements.   
   > * Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed pomodoro circles)   
   > as macro-scale analogues of civil-society feedback."   
   >   
   > DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC #1 -   
   > SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] |   
   > GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, 37, 52, 20, 71] PROTOTYPE ASSAY   
   > METHOD we have identified (eg: the temporal heuristic notion #272 as   
   > [#2, #70, #200] = bâʻar (H1197): KINDLE EMOTIVE RESPONSE can be noumena   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca