Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,081 of 44,666    |
|    dolf to dolf    |
|    Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (2/5)    |
|    01 Jul 25 18:32:39    |
      [continued from previous message]              > 1. Yí (疑) — Doubt or Deficiency—When Cybernetic Arbitration Falters       The       > character yí (疑) denotes doubt, hesitation, a failure of commitment.       > When the inner anima/animus dialogue calcifies or collapses—when one       > archetype dominates without counterbalance—the personality becomes       > one-sided, neurotic or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil society’s       > arbitration channels clog (courts overloaded, media captured, voices       > silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. Norms no longer congeal in       > shared trust but instead fragment into cynicism or apathy. Chronic yí       > manifests socially as delinquency (flouting the broken rules) or       > reprobation (moral exile from the public weal).       >       > 1. From Micro to Macro—A Unified View • Inner psyche = self-correcting       > system negotiating anima ↔ animus • Civil society = self-correcting       > system negotiating freedom ↔ order • Jié = structural boundary-making;       > Níng = normative cohesion • Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made       > humanly tangible • Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal       pathology       >       > In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what animus and       > anima enact within each of us: an ongoing arbitration of polarities       > through bounded form (jié) and collective cohesion (níng). When those       > cybernetic loops clog—when doubt (yí) ossifies rather than spurring       > inquiry—the result is disorders small (delinquency) or large (systemic       > breakdown, moral reprobation). Maintaining a vibrant civil society,       > then, means tending both our inner animus/anima balance and our external       > mechanisms of feedback, boundary and communal cement."       >       > DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty knowledge       > of others by making any physiological speculation from an extrapolation       > of metaphysical proposition such as "an ontic #22 - jié (結): formational       > (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - níng (凝): congealing / [#56, #79]       > concept of facilitated arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC /       > ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses as attenuated       > #152 / #174 - yí (疑): deficiency / [#29, #61, #62, #22]" and neither can       > you proffer medical advice upon hypothetical postulates quantification       > of meta logic process on "cognitive distortions are biased, automatic       > thoughts that skew our perception of events, situations, and ourselves."       >       > But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation on       > dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with ADHD who are       > not only challenged by core symptoms—such as inattention and impulsivity       > which is invariably animus associative—but they also often face       > significant difficulties with emotional regulation. These challenges can       > make them particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are       > numerous but we only mention as a focussed context):       >       > 1. Executive Function and Self-Regulation Deficits: ADHD involves       > deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that help       > manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these processes falter,       > individuals may struggle to evaluate their thoughts critically, allowing       > distortions to flourish unchecked.       >       > 1. Heightened Emotional Reactivity: ADHD is frequently accompanied by       > intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can intensify       > distortions like emotional reasoning, where the feeling of distress is       > mistaken for an objective truth."       >       > COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho-social       > cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics:       >       > 1. ADHD as a Miniature Cybernetic Society Think of each mind as its own       > civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, processing them, and issuing       > behavioral outputs. In ADHD the “sensing” (attention), “processing”       > (executive function) and “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are       > leaky. Just as a healthy polis relies on checks-and-balances, an ADHD       > mind struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.       >       > 1. Executive Function Deficits = Weak Animus Arbitration In Jungian       > terms, animus (assertive, boundary-setting principle) helps the psyche       > say “no” to distractions and “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s       > executive-function gaps—planning, working memory, impulse control—are       > exactly a failure of that animus function. Without a robust internal       > arbitrator, thoughts go unchecked: All-or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,       > Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.       >       > 1. Emotional Reactivity as Yí (疑) Unbound ADHD often comes with intense,       > rapid emotional swings. That hyper-reactivity maps to an amplified       > yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient feedback—that congeals into distortions       > like Emotional Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or       > Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left alone,       > these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or social       > withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in civil society.       >       > 1. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) Inside the ADHD Mind • Jié—Formational       > boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines that partition time, tasks,       > and goals. When ADHD thins those boundaries, the mind drifts. •       > Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that turn effort       > into flow. Without repeated practice (or scaffolding), norms never       > stick, and the system remains fluid to the point of chaos.       >       > 1. Facilitated Arbitration: External Cybernetic Interfaces Just as civil       > society requires courts and assemblies, ADHD minds benefit from       > anthropomorphic feedback loops—therapists, coaches, peer-support groups,       > apps with nudges and reminders. These external agents stand in as       > surrogate animus/anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines,       > external structure) and building níng (by rewarding consistency) to       > counteract yí’s drift.       >       > Putting it together: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating       > impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = erosion of animus       > arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive yí (emotional       > dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT, coaching, digital tools)       =       > external cybernetic nodes that restore jié & níng and tame yí       > By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening everyday       > arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent scaffolding, and       > empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-correcting loops both within       > the individual and in the wider social network.       >       > Further avenues:       > * Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to consciously       > define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny wins to congeal new       > norms (mini-níng).       > * Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability training as       > physiological arbitration complements.       > * Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed pomodoro circles)       > as macro-scale analogues of civil-society feedback."       >       > DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC #1 -       > SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] |       > GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, 37, 52, 20, 71] PROTOTYPE ASSAY       > METHOD we have identified (eg: the temporal heuristic notion #272 as       > [#2, #70, #200] = bâʻar (H1197): KINDLE EMOTIVE RESPONSE can be noumena              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca