[continued from previous message]
>>>>> natural law that serves to determine those conditions, because
>>>>> grounds of reason provide the rule for actions universally, from
>>>>> principles, without influence from the circumstances of time or place.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I adduce here counts only as an example, for intelligibility,
>>>>> and does not belong necessarily to our question, which must be
>>>>> decided from mere concepts independently of properties that we find
>>>>> in the actual world.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can now say without contradiction: all actions of rational
>>>>> beings, insofar as they are appearances (are encountered in some
>>>>> experience or other), are subject to natural necessity; but the
>>>>> very same actions, with respect only to the rational subject and
>>>>> its faculty of acting in accordance with bare reason, are free.
>>>>> What, then, is required for natural necessity? Nothing more than
>>>>> the determinability of every event in the sensible world according
>>>>> to constant laws, and therefore a relation to a cause within
>>>>> appearance; whereby the underlying thing in itself and its
>>>>> causality remain unknown. But I say: the law of nature remains,
>>>>> whether the rational being be a cause of effects in the sensible
>>>>> world through reason and hence through freedom, or whether that
>>>>> being does not determine such effects through rational grounds. For
>>>>> if the first is the case, the action takes place according to
>>>>> maxims whose effect within appearance will always conform to
>>>>> constant laws; if the second is the case, and the action does not
>>>>> take [IDEA #346] place according to principles of reason, then it
>>>>> is subject to the empirical laws of sensibility, and in both cases
>>>>> the effects are connected according to constant laws; but we
>>>>> require nothing more for natural necessity, and indeed know nothing
>>>>> more of it. In the first case, however, reason is the cause of
>>>>> these natural laws and is therefore free, in the second case the
>>>>> effects flow according to mere natural laws of sensibility, because
>>>>> reason exercises no influence on them; but, because of this, reason
>>>>> is not itself determined by sensibility (which is impossible), and
>>>>> it is therefore also free in this case. Therefore freedom does not
>>>>> impede the natural law of appearances, any more than this law
>>>>> interferes with the freedom of the practical use of reason, a use
>>>>> that stands in connection with things in themselves as determining
>>>>> grounds." [pages 93-97]
>>>>>
>>>>> DOLF: "How is the notion of a civil society related to the inherent
>>>>> human disposition of animus / anima and does such dynamic suggest
>>>>> there is an ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* (circumscribed as
>>>>> bounding) #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56, #79] concept of
>>>>> facilitated arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC /
>>>>> ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses an
>>>>> attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62,
>>>>> #22] that may in a chronic ontological state be regarded as either
>>>>> delinquency or reprobation?"
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER WAR
>> MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE
>> INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
>>
>> Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
>> crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity (eg:
>> RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA
>> OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* / #335 -
>> Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721 BC) as [#2
>> - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 - CENTRE (中), #4 -
>> BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)] being ANTI-STATISM
>> ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
>> TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH - CHRISTIANS AS
>> SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x
>> 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE
>> (NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 =
>> NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be brought before the International
>> Criminal Court, a permanent international tribunal. It was established
>> by the ROME STATUTE adopted 17 JULY 1998.
>>
>> On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same time
>> at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters in New
>> York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to sixty,
>> which was the minimum number required to bring the statute into force,
>> as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into force on 1 July
>> 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed (vis a vis in
>> support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION as
>> ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 BY MARTIN TANZER,
>> ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / DARREN CHESTER / WELLINGTON
>> SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM / VISCERAL RACIAL HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on
>> or after that date. and entered into force JULY 2002.
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> [IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
>> women from all walks of life]
>>
>> SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF CONTEMN
>> (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM REVISIONIST AS
>> NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY HAUGHTY SELF-
>> ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC (1994-2004): Given that
>> the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is
>> the mathematical meta-descriptive dialectic as idea template (AS OUR
>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TO WHICH DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to
>> the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF
>> RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that are
>> also implicit within QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
>> 1900 being principles upon which the respective REPUBLIC /
>> COMMONWEALTH were established.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [#74]
>>>>> [#14, #17]
>>>>> [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76, #78]
>>>>> [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34, #38, #44, #67]
>>>>> [#5, #6, #17, #39, #57, #77]
>>>>> [#37, #47, #78]
>>>>> [#12, #67]
>>>>> [#68]
>>>>> [#13, #15, #27, #32, #49, #65, #71, #78]
>>>>>
>>>>> COGITO: #493 / IDEA: #1876 = [#74 - CLOSURE (䦯, #74 = [#74]), #14
>>>>> - PENETRATION (銳, #31 = [#14, #17]), #78 - ON THE VERGE (將, #621
>>>>> = [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76,
>>>>> #78]), #27 - DUTIES (事, #290 = [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34, #38, #44,
>>>>> #67]), #57 - GUARDEDNESS (守, #201 = [#5, #6, #17, #39, #57, #77]),
>>>>> #37 - PURITY (睟, #162 = [#37, #47, #78]), #67 - DARKENING (晦, #79
>>>>> = [#12, #67]), #68 - DIMMING (瞢, #68 = [#68]), #71 - STOPPAGE (止,
>>>>> #350 = [#13, #15, #27, #32, #49, #65, #71, #78])]
>>>>>
>>>>> {@44: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#1659); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE:
>>>>> CHIANG (#1876)}
>>>>>
>>>>> TELOS TOTAL: #1876
>>>>> ONTIC TOTAL: #169
>>>>> DEME TOTAL: #614
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> #1659 as [#5, #10, #4, #800, #30, #800, #10] = eíd
lon (G1497):
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
