[continued from previous message]
>>>>>> activity of this being and can be the cause of actions whose
>>>>>> effect is an appearance in the sensible world – we cannot
>>>>>> comprehend at all. Yet the causality of reason with respect to
>>>>>> effects in the sensible world would nonetheless be freedom,
>>>>>> insofar as objective grounds, which are themselves ideas, are
>>>>>> taken to be determining with respect to that causality. For the
>>>>>> action of that causality would in that case not depend on any
>>>>>> subjective, hence also not on any temporal conditions, and would
>>>>>> therefore also not depend on the natural law that serves to
>>>>>> determine those conditions, because grounds of reason provide the
>>>>>> rule for actions universally, from principles, without influence
>>>>>> from the circumstances of time or place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I adduce here counts only as an example, for intelligibility,
>>>>>> and does not belong necessarily to our question, which must be
>>>>>> decided from mere concepts independently of properties that we
>>>>>> find in the actual world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can now say without contradiction: all actions of rational
>>>>>> beings, insofar as they are appearances (are encountered in some
>>>>>> experience or other), are subject to natural necessity; but the
>>>>>> very same actions, with respect only to the rational subject and
>>>>>> its faculty of acting in accordance with bare reason, are free.
>>>>>> What, then, is required for natural necessity? Nothing more than
>>>>>> the determinability of every event in the sensible world according
>>>>>> to constant laws, and therefore a relation to a cause within
>>>>>> appearance; whereby the underlying thing in itself and its
>>>>>> causality remain unknown. But I say: the law of nature remains,
>>>>>> whether the rational being be a cause of effects in the sensible
>>>>>> world through reason and hence through freedom, or whether that
>>>>>> being does not determine such effects through rational grounds.
>>>>>> For if the first is the case, the action takes place according to
>>>>>> maxims whose effect within appearance will always conform to
>>>>>> constant laws; if the second is the case, and the action does not
>>>>>> take [IDEA #346] place according to principles of reason, then it
>>>>>> is subject to the empirical laws of sensibility, and in both cases
>>>>>> the effects are connected according to constant laws; but we
>>>>>> require nothing more for natural necessity, and indeed know
>>>>>> nothing more of it. In the first case, however, reason is the
>>>>>> cause of these natural laws and is therefore free, in the second
>>>>>> case the effects flow according to mere natural laws of
>>>>>> sensibility, because reason exercises no influence on them; but,
>>>>>> because of this, reason is not itself determined by sensibility
>>>>>> (which is impossible), and it is therefore also free in this case.
>>>>>> Therefore freedom does not impede the natural law of appearances,
>>>>>> any more than this law interferes with the freedom of the
>>>>>> practical use of reason, a use that stands in connection with
>>>>>> things in themselves as determining grounds." [pages 93-97]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DOLF: "How is the notion of a civil society related to the
>>>>>> inherent human disposition of animus / anima and does such dynamic
>>>>>> suggest there is an ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL*
>>>>>> (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56,
>>>>>> #79] concept of facilitated arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC
>>>>>> SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when disordered
>>>>>> possesses an attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* /
>>>>>> [#29, #61, #62, #22] that may in a chronic ontological state be
>>>>>> regarded as either delinquency or reprobation?"
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER
>>> WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE
>>> INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
>>>
>>> Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
>>> crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity
>>> (eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA
>>> OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* / #335 -
>>> Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721 BC) as
>>> [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 - CENTRE (中),
>>> #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)] being ANTI-STATISM
>>> ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
>>> TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH - CHRISTIANS AS
>>> SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x
>>> 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE
>>> (NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 =
>>> NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be brought before the International
>>> Criminal Court, a permanent international tribunal. It was
>>> established by the ROME STATUTE adopted 17 JULY 1998.
>>>
>>> On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same time
>>> at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters in New
>>> York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to sixty,
>>> which was the minimum number required to bring the statute into
>>> force, as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into force on 1
>>> July 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed (vis a vis in
>>> support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION
>>> as ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 BY MARTIN
>>> TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / DARREN CHESTER /
>>> WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM / VISCERAL RACIAL HATRED AS
>>> PERSECUTION) on or after that date. and entered into force JULY 2002.
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
>>> women from all walks of life]
>>>
>>> SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF CONTEMN
>>> (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM REVISIONIST AS
>>> NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY HAUGHTY SELF-
>>> ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC (1994-2004): Given that
>>> the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is
>>> the mathematical meta-descriptive dialectic as idea template (AS OUR
>>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TO WHICH DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to
>>> the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF
>>> RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that
>>> are also implicit within QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
>>> OCTOBER 1900 being principles upon which the respective REPUBLIC /
>>> COMMONWEALTH were established.
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [#74]
>>>>>> [#14, #17]
>>>>>> [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76, #78]
>>>>>> [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34, #38, #44, #67]
>>>>>> [#5, #6, #17, #39, #57, #77]
>>>>>> [#37, #47, #78]
>>>>>> [#12, #67]
>>>>>> [#68]
>>>>>> [#13, #15, #27, #32, #49, #65, #71, #78]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> COGITO: #493 / IDEA: #1876 = [#74 - CLOSURE (䦯, #74 = [#74]), #14
>>>>>> - PENETRATION (銳, #31 = [#14, #17]), #78 - ON THE VERGE (將, #621
>>>>>> = [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76,
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
