Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,227 of 44,666    |
|    dolf to dolf    |
|    Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (19/27)    |
|    05 Jul 25 10:58:50    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>>> without counterbalance—the personality becomes one-sided, neurotic       >>>>>> or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil society’s arbitration       >>>>>> channels clog (courts overloaded, media captured, voices       >>>>>> silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. Norms no longer congeal       >>>>>> in shared trust but instead fragment into cynicism or apathy.       >>>>>> Chronic yí manifests socially as delinquency (flouting the broken       >>>>>> rules) or reprobation (moral exile from the public weal).       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 6. FROM MICRO TO MACRO—A UNIFIED VIEW:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> • Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating anima ↔ animus       >>>>>> • Civil society = self-correcting system negotiating freedom ↔ order       >>>>>> • Jié = structural boundary-making; Níng = normative cohesion        >>>>>> • Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made humanly tangible        >>>>>> • Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal pathology       >>>>>>       >>>>>> In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what animus       >>>>>> and anima enact within each of us: an ongoing arbitration of       >>>>>> polarities through bounded form (jié) and collective cohesion       >>>>>> (níng). When those cybernetic loops clog—when doubt (yí) ossifies       >>>>>> rather than spurring inquiry—the result is disorders small       >>>>>> (delinquency) or large (systemic breakdown, moral reprobation).       >>>>>> Maintaining a vibrant civil society, then, means tending both our       >>>>>> inner animus/anima balance and our external mechanisms of       >>>>>> feedback, boundary and communal cement."       >>>>>>       >>>>>> DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty       >>>>>> knowledge of others by making any physiological speculation from       >>>>>> an extrapolation of a metaphysical proposition such as "an ontic       >>>>>> #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* (circumscribed as bounding) #135 -       >>>>>> níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56, #79] concept of facilitated       >>>>>> arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC       >>>>>> PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses an attenuated #152 /       >>>>>> #174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62, #22]" and neither       >>>>>> can you proffer medical advice upon only hypothetical postulates       >>>>>> as quantification of meta logic process on "COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS       >>>>>> ARE BIASED, AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS THAT SKEW OUR PERCEPTION OF EVENTS,       >>>>>> SITUATIONS, AND OURSELVES."       >>>>>>       >>>>>> But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation upon       >>>>>> dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with ADHD       >>>>>> who are not only challenged by core symptoms—such as inattention       >>>>>> and impulsivity which is invariably animus associative—but they       >>>>>> also often face significant difficulties with emotional       >>>>>> regulation. These challenges can make them particularly vulnerable       >>>>>> to cognitive distortions (which are numerous but we only mention       >>>>>> here as a focussed context):       >>>>>>       >>>>>> EXECUTIVE FUNCTION AND SELF-REGULATION DEFICITS: ADHD involves       >>>>>> deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that       >>>>>> help manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these processes       >>>>>> falter, individuals may struggle to evaluate their thoughts       >>>>>> critically, allowing distortions to flourish unchecked.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> HEIGHTENED EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY: ADHD is frequently accompanied by       >>>>>> intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can       >>>>>> intensify distortions like emotional reasoning, where the feeling       >>>>>> of distress is mistaken for an objective truth."       >>>>>>       >>>>>> COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho-social       >>>>>> cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 1. ADHD AS A MINIATURE CYBERNETIC SOCIETY: Think of each       >>>>>> mind as its own civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, processing       >>>>>> them, and issuing behavioral outputs. In ADHD the       >>>>>> “sensing” (attention), “processing” (executive function) and       >>>>>> “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are leaky. Just as a       >>>>>> healthy polis relies on checks- and-balances, an ADHD mind       >>>>>> struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 2. EXECUTIVE FUNCTION DEFICITS = WEAK ANIMUS       ARBITRATION:       >>>>>> In Jungian terms, animus (assertive, boundary-setting principle)       >>>>>> helps the psyche say “no” to distractions and “yes” to       prioritized       >>>>>> tasks. ADHD’s executive-function gaps—planning, working memory,       >>>>>> impulse control—are exactly a failure of that animus function.       >>>>>> Without a robust internal arbitrator, thoughts go unchecked: All-       >>>>>> or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing, Fortune-Telling and the rest can       >>>>>> surge unchecked.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 3. EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY AS Yí (疑) UNBOUND ADHD: often       >>>>>> comes with intense, rapid emotional swings. That hyper-reactivity       >>>>>> maps to an amplified yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient feedback—that       >>>>>> congeals into distortions like Emotional Reasoning (“I feel       >>>>>> incompetent, so I must be”) or Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once,       >>>>>> I’ll lose my job”). Left alone, these distortions solidify into       >>>>>> chronic self-doubt or social withdrawal—ADHD’s version of       >>>>>> delinquency/reprobation in civil society.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 4. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) INSIDE THE ADHD MIND       >>>>>>       >>>>>> • Jié—Formational boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines       >>>>>> that partition time, tasks, and goals. When ADHD thins those       >>>>>> boundaries, the mind drifts.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> • Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that turn       >>>>>> effort into flow. Without repeated practice (or scaffolding),       >>>>>> norms never stick, and the system remains fluid to the point of       >>>>>> chaos.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 5. FACILITATED ARBITRATION: External Cybernetic       Interfaces       >>>>>> Just as civil society requires courts and assemblies, ADHD minds       >>>>>> benefit from anthropomorphic feedback loops—therapists, coaches,       >>>>>> peer- support groups, apps with nudges and reminders. These       >>>>>> external agents stand in as surrogate animus/anima figures,       >>>>>> reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines, external structure) and       >>>>>> building níng (by rewarding consistency) to counteract yí’s drift.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> PUTTING IT TOGETHER: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system       >>>>>> negotiating impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits =       >>>>>> erosion of animus arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive       >>>>>> yí (emotional dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT,       >>>>>> coaching, digital tools) = external cybernetic nodes that restore       >>>>>> jié & níng and tame yí       >>>>>>       >>>>>> By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening       >>>>>> everyday arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent       >>>>>> scaffolding, and empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-       >>>>>> correcting loops both within the individual and in the wider       >>>>>> social network.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> FURTHER AVENUES:       >>>>>> • Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching       people to       >>>>>> consciously define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny       >>>>>> wins to congeal new norms (mini-níng).       >>>>>> • Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca