XPost: alt.france, nl.politiek, alt.islam   
   XPost: uk.legal   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   Returning again to our explanation given over unresolved INSURANCE   
   MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we alleged are relevant to this VCAT   
   REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE given   
   the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM". At our   
   last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @ CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL   
   GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we requested action of CLOSURE of a   
   DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION   
   which resulted within improper as false characterisation within POLICE   
   COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite my reasonable attempts to have those   
   improper entries amended due to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE   
   CONSEQUENCE upon my AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has   
   prevailed to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most   
   recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE   
   ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER: Q11839982 OF 30   
   AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024,   
   without explanation.   
      
   That document contains details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as CHIEF   
   LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-NATIONAL   
   CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS HEARING of 7   
   DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my   
   two telephone calls as the basis of a false report to police and   
   perjured evidence.  The following is a transcript (which may contain   
   transcription and conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11   
   FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL &   
   ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of   
   0936 hours 7 DECEMBER 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE   
   presiding over CASE NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN   
   CASUALTY & LIFE (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The   
   proceedings were conducted by telephone hook-up.   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?   
      
   Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by   
      
   MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have   
   SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called   
   on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the   
   Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter   
   raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I   
   understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason   
   why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless   
   there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by   
   bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if   
   necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then   
   determine how best to deal with it.   
      
   In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,   
   if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the   
   Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact   
   what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain   
   what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of   
   course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has   
   finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.   
      
   MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I received a   
   telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that   
   he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages   
   on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those   
   messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my   
   family. I, that morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the   
   matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I   
   not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am   
   presenting myself by way of telephone today.   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?   
      
   MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript   
   of those   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?   
      
   MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate   
   to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the   
   matter it ought to be on evidence.   
      
   MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape   
      
   MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the   
   volume.   
      
   THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.   
      
   TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.   
      
   TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT IF   
   YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF YOUR PAST   
   TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE HAVING ANOTHER   
   CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH YOU FURTHER AND WE WILL   
   ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME STAGE. AT SOME STAGE YOU ARE   
   GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNISE THE FACT THAT YOU ARE A BLASPHEMER. YOUR   
   RELIGIOUS CONTEXT HAS NO CONTINUING VALIDITY AND SINCE I AM ABLE TO   
   RATIONALLY PROVE THAT WITH A MATHEMATICAL MODEL..... YOU ARE GOING TO   
   UNDERSTAND HOW FORCEFUL AND HARD METAPHYSICS IS."   
      
   MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.   
      
   The purpose of our pre-CONSULTATION NOTE to our MEDICAL SPECIALIST dated   
   8 JULY 2025, was to proffer advice on our currently writing a submission   
   within VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXXX / 2025 as a LIFE CONTEXT STATEMENT which   
   encompasses that PROTEST EVENT ON 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL   
   INTERACTION and over which there is exuded a certain self-assuredness   
   and satisfaction expressed within the content of TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO   
   made to CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE INSURER on 30 NOVEMBER 2001 as then   
   causal for the EXTRA-ORDINARY VCAT DIRECTIONS HEARING dated 5 DECEMBER   
   2001 conveying their misrepresentation as impetus for a strikeout of the   
   matter, as then related matters we had sought closure over involving   
   other organisational misrepresentation of our totally reasonable,   
   premeditated as determined actions with respects to the devising a   
   strategy to ensure survival of our INSURANCE MATTER of now some 30 years   
   duration.   
      
   Firstly with respects to substantiating the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL   
   #1621 / 1772 - ANTI-STATISM", we provided our MEDICAL SPECIALIST with an   
   informal research opinion dated 7 JULY 2025 on such precedent of action   
   with regards to "EXAMINING CAPTAIN COOK'S SECRET COMMAND 30 JULY 1768   
   THROUGH THE LENS OF KANT'S CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON 1781 / 1787 |   
   PROLEGOMENA 1783 / 1787 WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE A COSMOLOGICAL RATIONALE."   
      
      
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)